Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.42 released

[swagger]

@Marcin,

Oh okay, thanks for that info. Just wondering if something went wrong with CNET.

@Zach,

These guys work tirelessly around the clock and adding the ignore list/context menu for 64-bit machines was probably not a walk in the park. Not to mention monitoring the forums and remaining one of the best in detecting the newest and most stubborn threats. Give them a break man

Regards,

Keith

[zach47]

I'm not a programmer so I can't tell you what was all involved. I'm not here to argue with anybody. I agree Malwarebytes is a great product. It was just my opinion.

[swagger]

I'm not arguing Just saying... They work hard, you can believe that. What suggestions were you looking for?

[zach47]

With due respect I'm going to leave this subject alone for now. Thank You

[swagger]

No problem... Have a good one

[exile360]

Thank you Exile - I expected this much because the request came right after the request to add Malwarebytes new version to my startup folder.

cheers

You're welcome

[noknojon]

@ swagger -

I was directed to C Net - Zach47 may have also meant auto updates etc. -

Fully uninstalled mine first, then did a new clean install of 1.42 - Updated automatically and did quick scan - No problems

[glenski]

Great news ! Keep up the good work Guyz ! Your Fellow Member Glenski

[Danerd9]

MBAM 1.42 is running very smoothly and fast. !!

I luv it even though the changes are very hard to recognize. I feel the program is faster and lighter for some reason cause boot is faster now. Plus the protection Module loads quicker.

[gonwk]

Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.42 has been released. ..... Also, we have added a few additional features. ...

Hi RubbeR Ducky & MBAM Team,

Wow ... 64-Bit Context Menu ADDED ... now I can do On-Demand scan of any files or folder with MBAM.

THANKS,

G!

[noknojon]

HI Team and well done -

I have done a quick and full scan with the latest versions - It worked very well even running in the background with 2 other programs operating -

The long scan seemed quicker and the quick scan took about the same as usual - About 7.30 min Quick scan - About 1.25 hrs Long scan -

Not much on this computer (75% free space) but very happy -

[Firefox]

nice job guys

[catscomputer]

Thanks for the hard work in creating this new version MBAM team. It's running smoothly on my system and I've noticed it is scanning a little faster too. Nice work!

[CCMUA2009]

anyone with Vista OS running into the problem I noted on this post here?

http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=32860

[jmonge]

it is working fine here

[AdvancedSetup]

And was reported here working fine too.

http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.p...st&p=167658

[West]

Had malwarbytes host a manual update database yet? I only using those when I am using on my clients infected system. Since the old site to the rules aren't yet compatible with the new version of malwarebytes, it will have a database error and won't work which you have to reinstall malwarebytes with it's database that came with the installer which is the 12/3/09 database. Anyhow let me know thanks.

West

[AdvancedSetup]

Please see solution 4 here: http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=10138

[Danerd9]

*sobs* i miss the logo where it said, "Malwarebytes, removing malware one byte at a time." :'(

but the big fixes have inproved greatly and there is a new logo in the protection tab.

[noknojon]

-

There still seems to be a lot of AVG users who are asking about why it is causing a problem -

We know there is a FAQ section but they don't seem to be reading it - Almost need a sign post to send a few there first -