Root Admin RubbeR DuckY Posted January 22, 2008 Author Root Admin ID:12163 Share Posted January 22, 2008 It appears that if testservice was ran before, when you register - protection may have an error. Looking into CPU usage issue as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walker Posted January 22, 2008 ID:12164 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Hi everyone,Congratulations on the first release version As beta's go this was a prettt smooth one.As usual updating went fine and running the realtime protection also went without a glitch.Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 262Scan type: Quick ScanObjects scanned: 19424Time elapsed: 1 minute(s), 44 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 262Scan type: Full Scan (C:\|)Objects scanned: 40526Time elapsed: 5 minute(s), 15 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leofelix Posted January 22, 2008 ID:12168 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Hi AllJust downloaded and reinstalled in my desktop P.C running XP PRO SP 2...and got the same error, I tried to shut down Spysweeper with no results, 'cause I thought there is a conflict with Webroot sw..I do not know, maybe some conflicts with other software B)anyway Malwarebytes ' Anti-Malware real protection module perfectly works in my notebook running XP HOME SP 2,and in both computers has a very fast and accurate scanning Thank you Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
YoKenny1 Posted January 22, 2008 ID:12175 Share Posted January 22, 2008 Its working well on my WinXP Pro systemMalwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 262Scan type: Quick ScanObjects scanned: 23882Time elapsed: 6 minute(s), 9 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0Memory Processes Infected:(No malicious items detected)Memory Modules Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Keys Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Values Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Data Items Infected:(No malicious items detected)Folders Infected:(No malicious items detected)Files Infected:(No malicious items detected) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurkingatu2 Posted January 22, 2008 ID:12201 Share Posted January 22, 2008 hellocongrats on the final mbam 1.0 and thanks so much for letting me help ok uninstalled mbam 0.91 had a error a few times uninstalling i think 106 but it uninstalled and reinstalled mbam 1.0 with no problems updated d.b.v from 262 to 264 all ok Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 264Scan type: Full Scan (A:\|C:\|)Objects scanned: 47444Time elapsed: 8 minute(s), 35 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 264Scan type: Quick ScanObjects scanned: 18411Time elapsed: 2 minute(s), 40 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0ran test for guard all ok ran start protection all installed and running ok the only thing i can see so far is that after i restart the pc for the firstfew minuetes my cpu in task mananger for mbamservice.exe is going between 60 and 80% then stops then all is ok thanks B) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin RubbeR DuckY Posted January 23, 2008 Author Root Admin ID:12203 Share Posted January 23, 2008 It is doing a lot of work in those first few minutes. We will try to get this optimized further. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoneWolf Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12210 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Working well here on XP home. Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 264Scan type: Full Scan (C:\|)Objects scanned: 95957Time elapsed: 1 hour(s), 30 minute(s), 33 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0Memory Processes Infected:(No malicious items detected)Memory Modules Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Keys Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Values Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Data Items Infected:(No malicious items detected)Folders Infected:(No malicious items detected)Files Infected:(No malicious items detected) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrgigabyte Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12215 Share Posted January 23, 2008 hi all i just wanted to report since it been 1 day that everything is still running great mbam is very low in system about 14.000 total i see a little bit of surge but like rubber duckly said it only for a little bit at the begining then it does gets lower . if it can be fix it would be great other wise i am very happy with this product just like rogue remover mrgigabyte Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
G1111 Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12230 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Ran the protection module today. No problems so far on my machine XP Home SP2 with WinPatrol, ProcessGuard, RegDefend, BOClean, Kaspersky AV 7 and Outpost Firewall 6. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Ton Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12246 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Uninstalled the previous one without problems and installed version 1.00. Install went smoothly. Scan are fast as usually. I also have SUPERAntiSpyware 4.0 beta installed with realtime monitoring on. When I tested the version one monitor it crashes when the Superantispyware realtime monitor is on, but works when it is turned off. I have some screenshots of the error messages, but I do not know how to upload them.1. Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 262Scan type: Quick ScanObjects scanned: 19181Time elapsed: 1 minute(s), 56 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 02. Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 262Scan type: Full Scan (C:\|)Objects scanned: 76365Time elapsed: 12 minute(s), 48 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0Memory Processes Infected:(No malicious items detected)Memory Modules Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Keys Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Values Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Data Items Infected:(No malicious items detected)Folders Infected:(No malicious items detected)Files Infected:(No malicious items detected)Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dakeyras Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12250 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Uninstalled the previous one without problems and installed version 1.00. Install went smoothly. Scan are fast as usually. I also have SUPERAntiSpyware 4.0 beta installed with realtime monitoring on. When I tested the version one monitor it crashes when the Superantispyware realtime monitor is on, but works when it is turned off. I have some screenshots of the error messages, but I do not know how to upload them.Hi 2Ton .Personally I think it is a unwise move to have the guard features(real time protection) of multiple anti-spyware applications running consecutively. As you have found out it caused a instability/system conflict plus always the chance of actually lessening online protection if each monitoring feature is trying to perform the same task. I have SAS myself and just keep it as a on-demand scanner.I use the below method myself for uploading screenshots:Create a account with photobucket.Upload a image from your computer to the created photobucket account.Insert the image code directly or use the 'Insert Image' tab here in the 'Add Reply' window .Example of the code would be:[img=http://i223.photobucket.com/albums/dd202/Dakeyras_album/tabexample.gif]. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeanInMontana Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12256 Share Posted January 23, 2008 I had updated to first release from the prerelease version and then saw you wanted a clean install. This morning I was going to install from the MG download and when I did the uninstall got the error message in screen shot. It did uninstall with repeated 'OK' clicks on the error message. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ky331 Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12258 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Since registering MBAM, I've noticed that every time I receive a database update, Windows Defender will pick up on the MBAM service and driver (requesting I re-approve/deny them). Is this normal (for database updates)? I'm also wondering: having enabled protection, MBAM is automatically starting up with Windows. Yet, this startup was not deteced/acknowledged by any of my usual detectors: Windows Defender, SpyBot's TeaTimer, nor WinPatrol. Without asking you to reveal anything you want to keep confidential, I guess this is some kind of security feature... to keep MBAM's startup from being detected by malware??? P.S. If this question/comment is too-revealing, please feel free to suppress it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaB69 Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12263 Share Posted January 23, 2008 Hi all,Database updated to 270No detection so no FP Regards,MaB Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lurkingatu2 Posted January 23, 2008 ID:12266 Share Posted January 23, 2008 helloupdated mbam 1.0 d.b.v from 264 to 270 after the update mbamservice.exe usescpu in the task manager for a few then stops Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 270Scan type: Full Scan (C:\|)Objects scanned: 48389Time elapsed: 9 minute(s), 6 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 270Scan type: Quick ScanObjects scanned: 18439Time elapsed: 2 minute(s), 55 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0 also when i go to start>all programs>malwarebytes anti-malware and click on logs nothing happens all running good and light here thanks B) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin RubbeR DuckY Posted January 23, 2008 Author Root Admin ID:12269 Share Posted January 23, 2008 ky331,We will look into the driver issue, thanks!. As for your other question, it is not a secret at all. mbamservice.exe registers itself as a service using the proper protocol and sets itself as an autostart service. If you use HijackThis, you will see mbamservice as an entry.We are still fixing tons of little bugs . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric the Red Posted January 24, 2008 ID:12301 Share Posted January 24, 2008 Marcin,Congratulations on the release.I have run a quick scan on a Vista Home Premium machine with Intel Dual Core 6400 @ 2.13Mhz processors, no concerns about CPU usage. Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware version 1.00Database version: 270Scan type: Quick ScanObjects scanned: 19974Time elapsed: 3 minute(s), 17 second(s)Memory Processes Infected: 0Memory Modules Infected: 0Registry Keys Infected: 0Registry Values Infected: 0Registry Data Items Infected: 0Folders Infected: 0Files Infected: 0Memory Processes Infected:(No malicious items detected)Memory Modules Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Keys Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Values Infected:(No malicious items detected)Registry Data Items Infected:(No malicious items detected)Folders Infected:(No malicious items detected)Files Infected:(No malicious items detected) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Ton Posted January 24, 2008 ID:12303 Share Posted January 24, 2008 Hi 2Ton .Personally I think it is a unwise move to have the guard features(real time protection) of multiple anti-spyware applications running consecutively. As you have found out it caused a instability/system conflict plus always the chance of actually lessening online protection if each monitoring feature is trying to perform the same task.@DakeyrasI do not usually do that myself, but I was testing if Malwarebytes' Anti-malware behave well with others. Other anti-malware apps I had installed in the past could exist well with SAS or with each other without apparent conflict or not being able to start, then it was my choice to disable their realtime monitoring. Here are the error screens:Thanks Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin RubbeR DuckY Posted January 24, 2008 Author Root Admin ID:12304 Share Posted January 24, 2008 2Ton, I have informed Mahesh and we will be testing compatbility Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Ton Posted January 24, 2008 ID:12306 Share Posted January 24, 2008 2Ton, I have informed Mahesh and we will be testing compatbilityGlad I could help. Thanks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts