LoneWolf

Updated def's and scanned again, no FP's this time. Thank you Bruce.

Nice to know it's FP's, but another scan and they still appear??? mbam_log_2009_11_04__08_42_30_.txt

Can anyone confirm that these may be FP's ?

False positives? Edit: I believe these may belong to Shadow Defender. http://www.shadowdefender.com/ Edit again: Not a peep out of A-squared or Prevx with their scans. mbam_log_2009_11_03__13_36_58_.txt

I did install a custom Application Filtering GUI replacement for Look n stop firewall a while back from here http://www.mntolympus.org/phpBB3/viewtopic...f=38&t=6028 but have sense uninstalled LnS. Could this possiably be it?

Just did a quickscan with MBAM 1.40 and got the same detection as centralkong, wondering if indeed it is a FP or genuine and safe to remove? This was detected durring the heuristic scan. mbam_log_2009_08_08__09_45_50_.txt mbam_log_2009_08_08__09_45_50_.txt

Should I worry about this or maybe a FP? mbam_log_2009_05_04__19_03_26_.txt mbam_log_2009_05_04__19_03_26_.txt

I see no explorer.exe here???

After updating defs and doing another scan all is clean?????? mbam_log_2009_02_08__16_26_56_.txt mbam_log_2009_02_08__16_26_56_.txt

Detected at the end of quick scan.......Xp home mbam_log_2009_02_08__12_01_43_.txt mbam_log_2009_02_08__12_01_43_.txt

So, should I remove this or leave it alone. Thank you for your help.

Thanks for checking. GTDownDE_87.zip GTDownDE_87.zip

Infection or FP ? Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.31 Database version: 1497 Windows 5.1.2600 Service Pack 1 12/13/2008 6:39:25 PM mbam-log-2008-12-13 (18-39-20).txt Scan type: Quick Scan Objects scanned: 58739 Time elapsed: 11 minute(s), 16 second(s) Memory Processes Infected: 0 Memory Modules Infected: 0 Registry Keys Infected: 4 Registry Values Infected: 0 Registry Data Items Infected: 0 Folders Infected: 0 Files Infected: 1 Memory Processes Infected: (No malicious items detected) Memory Modules Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Keys Infected: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\TypeLib\{df058c45-cd18-453e-8745-5a77f60722ab} (Adware.Gdown) -> No action taken. [4134524130346988668370154069808879130170702225196926697026226618247118672320246 82317702567252169182424] HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Interface\{b5a33c35-7298-4d15-8753-a2e851e2eab3} (Adware.Gdown) -> No action taken. [4134524130346988668370154069808879130170702225196926697026226618247118672320246 82317702567252169182424] HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Interface\{f0d2b812-752d-4af1-a2fb-968c4d8446db} (Adware.Gdown) -> No action taken. [4134524130346988668370154069808879130170702225196926697026226618247118672320246 82317702567252169182424] HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\CLSID\{e856b973-45fd-4559-8f82-eab539144667} (Adware.Gdown) -> No action taken. [4134524130346988668370154069808879130170702225196926697026226618247118672320246 82317702567252169182424] Registry Values Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Data Items Infected: (No malicious items detected) Folders Infected: (No malicious items detected) Files Infected: C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\GTDownDE_87.ocx (Adware.Gdown) -> No action taken. [4134524130346988668370154069808879130170702225196926697026226618247118672320246 82317702567252169182424]

Hi gerardwil, Yes thats normal with Rogue Remover, scanning is very fast.

Selected another update and it's back to normal.

Noticed this today.

Not a trial, not yet at least. http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=4241

Ok, I sorry.

But then an Anti Virus should not be called as such either right, I meen it would have to catch all viruses right? Oooops I meen virii.

603? Somethings not right there. Heres what I have.

Virii is a form of malware but it is an incorrect pluralization of "virus" Which is the job of an Anti-Virus. And yes a layered defense is needed no matter what combo someone goes with or what each one in that combo calls themself. I'm not saying to load up on scanners but differant approaches to ones security. You know this Nathan. But to each their own. Yes it would be nice if one app would keep one secure but that ain't gonna happen.

With my box that is the job of Avast. Again..................A layered defense.

Malware is a general term used when discribing unwanted/harmful programs. One should never assume that any one app will cover everything nasty out there. MBAM compliments other security software I have on my box and does a nice job at that. A layered defense is IMO the best way if not the only way to go. What one misses another will stop, at least thats the plan. About calling it an Anti-malware, I see no problem with this catigory. Malwarebytes Anti-spywareBotRootkitWormTrojanDialerAdwareBackdoorVirusHijackerKeyloggerRogue would just be too long.

Thanks for the info.

Just curious, should I keep RougeRemover free on sense I have MBAM Pro? Should'nt MBAM take care of what RR free does?