GT500 Posted April 27, 2009 ID:76654 Share Posted April 27, 2009 Looks like we may have a properly working plug-in soon which I won't need to freak out about . Stay tuned.You going to make MBAM capable of loading the registry off of each drive like Spybot S&D does? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteelTreipd Posted April 27, 2009 ID:76662 Share Posted April 27, 2009 That will be half the fun also.Do you utilize RunScanner?? Or do you build that capability into the software? For better control it is probably best to follow suit with SpyBot, but that will take time and testing. I do not know all the details yet but our team (UBCD4Win) will be and are here to help with this support. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exile360 Posted April 27, 2009 ID:76673 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I'm glad to see the possibility of a happy resolution to this issue has been reached. I'm sure that most of us here (myself included) certainly appreciate what a powerful tool an offline disc can be (I've got a slew of them myself, UBCD4Win included) in my personal toolkit just in case I need it and there have absolutely been plenty of times that I did. My primary concern, as I believe was shared with others here, although I can't speak for them, was that if MBAM doesn't play nice offline or is ineffective in PE mode because of the way its detection works then it would be a futile effort that could do more harm than good, but it seems you guys have overcome many hurdles already and with the devs in on it the potential for problems is highly reduced . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilander999 Posted April 27, 2009 ID:76678 Share Posted April 27, 2009 I'm glad to see the possibility of a happy resolution to this issue has been reached. I'm sure that most of us here (myself included) certainly appreciate what a powerful tool an offline disc can be (I've got a slew of them myself, UBCD4Win included) in my personal toolkit just in case I need it and there have absolutely been plenty of times that I did. My primary concern, as I believe was shared with others here, although I can't speak for them, was that if MBAM doesn't play nice offline or is ineffective in PE mode because of the way its detection works then it would be a futile effort that could do more harm than good, but it seems you guys have overcome many hurdles already and with the devs in on it the potential for problems is highly reduced .I will have a beta version of the new plugin made available to the developers as soon as feasible. Most concerns about this have been put to rest and I have agreed to work directly with them to resolve any issues that arise. There is a small hurdle right now on the re-directions of the folder structure used for scanning and I am awaiting word from Joshua if this is something he can easily do on his end, or if the mbam developers need to address it directly.It's always a good thing when differences in opinion can be resolved peacefully. PS: If you guys have room on the payroll for an "Adviser" about pre-installed environments.... I'm not rich by any means. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oddworld Posted May 4, 2009 Author ID:78395 Share Posted May 4, 2009 so wuzzzzuup, any progress? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bryen Posted May 7, 2009 ID:78933 Share Posted May 7, 2009 I will have a beta version of the new plugin made available to the developers as soon as feasible. Most concerns about this have been put to rest and I have agreed to work directly with them to resolve any issues that arise. There is a small hurdle right now on the re-directions of the folder structure used for scanning and I am awaiting word from Joshua if this is something he can easily do on his end, or if the mbam developers need to address it directly.It's always a good thing when differences in opinion can be resolved peacefully. PS: If you guys have room on the payroll for an "Adviser" about pre-installed environments.... I'm not rich by any means. I am glad some sort of resolution and amicable arrangemt is coming on this matter i use both products at home ( my kids love getting virus and trojans on their pc's)it looks like a marraige made in cyberspace gratz all concerned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilander999 Posted May 8, 2009 ID:79288 Share Posted May 8, 2009 so wuzzzzuup, any progress?Progress is being made. No timeline for release has been established.Good things take patience, this will be worth the wait. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500 Posted May 9, 2009 ID:79395 Share Posted May 9, 2009 Good things take patience, this will be worth the wait. We're used to wait times around here. I waited for a year and a half for a 64-bit version of the protection module, and it's finally in beta. I think we can wait a bit for this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilander999 Posted May 11, 2009 ID:79725 Share Posted May 11, 2009 We're used to wait times around here. I waited for a year and a half for a 64-bit version of the protection module, and it's finally in beta. I think we can wait a bit for this. This is NOT going to take a year and a half. Aside from ONE minor hiccup, I have this one nailed down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exile360 Posted May 11, 2009 ID:79730 Share Posted May 11, 2009 Yeah, I doubt it will be that long, but you also might want to hold off until 1.37 (the current beta) is released because MBAM went through quite a few changes in that build . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exile360 Posted May 11, 2009 ID:79752 Share Posted May 11, 2009 Take a look at this post from RubberDuckY (he's one of the main developers for Malwarebytes' ). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilander999 Posted May 11, 2009 ID:79765 Share Posted May 11, 2009 Take a look at this post from RubberDuckY (he's one of the main developers for Malwarebytes' ).Your making a joke?Between those 2 posts is when I talked to him on the phone about this.Although, knowing a new version with "quite a few changes" was already in testing would have been useful information a week ago. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exile360 Posted May 11, 2009 ID:79772 Share Posted May 11, 2009 Oh, sorry, the post before the one that I was replying to got deleted by a mod for spamming, it was a response to someone saying that Malwarebytes' wasn't designed to work that way and that the developers didn't support it so I indicated a post where one of the developers actually said that they were now working on an official plugin for it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin RubbeR DuckY Posted May 11, 2009 Root Admin ID:79784 Share Posted May 11, 2009 1.37 will have a ton of changes to the back end and increased scanning power and a new protection module. Nothing that should affect the PE plugin. As for the PE plugin, the ball is in my court now and when I am back from a business trip I will begin answering those e-mails. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilander999 Posted May 12, 2009 ID:80051 Share Posted May 12, 2009 Oh, sorry, the post before the one that I was replying to got deleted by a mod for spamming,lol, that makes sense now. You had me confused yesturday when I saw your 2 posts together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oddworld Posted May 31, 2009 Author ID:85295 Share Posted May 31, 2009 sooooo, the 1.37 is out, is the plugin creation developing?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin RubbeR DuckY Posted May 31, 2009 Root Admin ID:85317 Share Posted May 31, 2009 Almost done . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oddworld Posted June 6, 2009 Author ID:87232 Share Posted June 6, 2009 ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500 Posted June 6, 2009 ID:87368 Share Posted June 6, 2009 ??I think there some testing going on, and some hurdles they are trying to get over. I don't have any specifics, but I know that the kind of work they are doing takes time, and can be difficult. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlsnooks Posted June 9, 2009 ID:88143 Share Posted June 9, 2009 good people,What is the final state of things here.I have a couple of Win7 RC Preexecution Environment (PE) USB sticks which I've generated using the MSDN documentation and the documentation provided with the Windows 7 Automated Installation Kit.My desire is to add MalwareBytes to my "Diagnose and Fix" PE stick.I got past having to add msvbvm60.dll and shfolder.dll to my PE stick's \windows\system32 folder.Install completes but attempts to run produces an error msg of "Error loading databse. Line: #0. (0)."The database is present in the \programdata folder so that's not the problem.What am I missing? I assume I need to include a couple more MS dlls on the stick.I always prefer to roll my own "boot/repair" disks.I've not tried putting MalwareBytes on my Recovery Environment USB stick. Perhaps the subset of Win 7 in the REwin.wim will suffice, just haven't got around to trying.I was hoping that a MalwareBytes guru would lead me in correct direction here. Thanks, Karllol, that makes sense now. You had me confused yesturday when I saw your 2 posts together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin AdvancedSetup Posted June 9, 2009 Root Admin ID:88257 Share Posted June 9, 2009 Please see the post above yours from 06/06/2009 - There is work going on but as with most software companies it is often difficult to give a specific date as many things are going on and this is certainly not the only task they're looking at. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilander999 Posted June 10, 2009 ID:88392 Share Posted June 10, 2009 Install completes but attempts to run produces an error msg of "Error loading databse. Line: #0. (0)."The database is present in the \programdata folder so that's not the problem.What am I missing? I assume I need to include a couple more MS dlls on the stick.We are not supporting a win7 build environment at this time. For XP/2K3 i386\SYSTEM32\CRTDLL.DLL solved that particular problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hilander999 Posted June 10, 2009 ID:88393 Share Posted June 10, 2009 You also need a working cryptography routine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ATechGuy Posted July 11, 2009 ID:97533 Share Posted July 11, 2009 You also need a working cryptography routine.May I presume this is related to "Error Code 718, The Keyset is not Defined" that wenow get with 1.38? Any suggestions on how to fix this?Thanks,-Ken Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Root Admin RubbeR DuckY Posted July 12, 2009 Root Admin ID:97625 Share Posted July 12, 2009 Ken,Once we have a fix for the problem, we will release a PE build with our technician's license. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts