STL Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36374 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Hi`MBAM is detecting this as a rogue http://www.download.com/Anti-AD-Guard/3000...cdlPid=10740787False positive? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigger93 Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36375 Share Posted November 25, 2008 We need a log from developer mode please. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Posted November 25, 2008 Author ID:36378 Share Posted November 25, 2008 We need a log from developer mode please.I am not shure what developer mode means, but here is the log MBAM created. It is in Danish languge, hope you can use it:Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.30Database version: 1419Windows 5.1.2600 Service Pack 325-11-2008 01:33:22mbam-log-2008-11-25 (01-33-15).txtSkan type: Hurtig skanningObjekter skannet: 50957Tid tilbagelagt: 2 minute(s), 40 second(s)Inficerede Hukommelses Processer: 0Inficerede Hukommelses Moduler: 0Inficerede Registeringsdatabase N Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigger93 Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36379 Share Posted November 25, 2008 You should have read this before posting, it explains a developer log: http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3228However, we do not need that. As far as I can tell, its not a false positive, however we'll have to wait until one of the developers can confirm/deny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Posted November 25, 2008 Author ID:36381 Share Posted November 25, 2008 You should have read this before posting, it explains a developer log: http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=3228However, we do not need that. As far as I can tell, its not a false positive, however we'll have to wait until one of the developers can confirm/deny.Sorry for not reading it Develeper mode log here:Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.30Database version: 1419Windows 5.1.2600 Service Pack 325-11-2008 02:18:37mbam-log-2008-11-25 (02-18-07) dev-mode.txtSkan type: Hurtig skanningObjekter skannet: 50961Tid tilbagelagt: 3 minute(s), 6 second(s)Inficerede Hukommelses Processer: 0Inficerede Hukommelses Moduler: 1Inficerede Registeringsdatabase N Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hardhead Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36390 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Hello STL,I'm not the developer but I can confirm that this is a rogue product.It is listed in our database here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raid Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36393 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Hi All.it's not a false positive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36400 Share Posted November 25, 2008 HiRaid as malware researcher you should be able to tell us what is rogue in this product - so please inform us. For your information only:http://www.siteadvisor.com/sites/gold-soft...loads/15761884/http://www.download.com/Anti-AD-Guard/3000...4-10551312.htmlhttp://www.softpedia.com/get/Internet/Popu...-AD-Guard.shtml Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosirrah Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36409 Share Posted November 25, 2008 @RaidWhen you get the chance fire this one up and check for intentional FPs with it , I cant remember adding this one myself but it is likely that intentional FPs were the reason why . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Posted November 25, 2008 Author ID:36424 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Intentional FP? You lost me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosirrah Posted November 25, 2008 ID:36428 Share Posted November 25, 2008 If the application in question makes intentional FPs to get people to buy then it is rogue . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STL Posted November 25, 2008 Author ID:36430 Share Posted November 25, 2008 If the application in question makes intentional FPs to get people to buy then it is rogue .Ah! Thank you for the clarification nossirah. But how could this apply to the adblocker in question here? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie Posted November 26, 2008 ID:36516 Share Posted November 26, 2008 rather quite here If the application in question makes intentional FPs to get people to buy then it is rogueYes you are right - but please explain me how an ad-blocker can make FPs? I should like to know. Anti-AD Guard is a program that filters and blocks commercial banners from being loaded by browsers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raid Posted November 27, 2008 ID:36577 Share Posted November 27, 2008 @RaidWhen you get the chance fire this one up and check for intentional FPs with it , I cant remember adding this one myself but it is likely that intentional FPs were the reason why .Will do. I think it was added for intentional FP's, but I will double check. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie Posted November 30, 2008 ID:36991 Share Posted November 30, 2008 Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware no longer detects Anti-AD Guard Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frankie Posted November 30, 2008 ID:37015 Share Posted November 30, 2008 It could have been a good idea if Malwarebytes would tell they did a mistake, but perhaps they want to forget this thread asap Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nosirrah Posted November 30, 2008 ID:37043 Share Posted November 30, 2008 It could have been a good idea if Malwarebytes would tell they did a mistake, but perhaps they want to forget this thread asap I don't remember adding it so it was likely at the very beginning and could have been rogue back then , I just don't know .Its not now so it was removed . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raid Posted December 1, 2008 ID:37275 Share Posted December 1, 2008 It could have been a good idea if Malwarebytes would tell they did a mistake, but perhaps they want to forget this thread asap Sorry... I've been dealing with matters outside the online world. Apologies for coming back to this thread so late, but the program isn't rogue anymore; and We've removed the definitions for it. The definitions were from sometime ago, so I don't know why they were added; perhaps it came with some adware bundled... I honestly, don't know. Conspiracy theories aside, I appreciate you bringing this to our attention, and would appreciate it if you should have further questions to feel free and ask.Thanks again! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now