As I said, I fully understand and appreciate MalwareBytes good intentions. My concern is that as a paying customer, as Joe Bloggs sitting at his PC - your product is blocking me from accessing websites, blogs and IRC servers that I trust, and in my case, for whatever reason I received no notification that this was being done. From my view-point you are the ones blocking the access, and therefore the ones that I would take issue with. I have no dealings with the hosting companies who host these sites and services and nor should I have to (unless of course it is my own website / service being blocked). I am, as an end-user who wishes to protect the integrity of the security that MBAM provides, essentially unable to progress as I can't access the sites to inform the site/domain owners of the issue (other than by by-passing the IP Protection - which I am recommended not to do) this puts me, the blameless end-user in a catch-22 position, which could drive me away from your product. My extremely high regard for MBAM's faultless malware detection prevents me from doing so I would warrant most end-users of MBAM would not think "oh the website is being blocked, I'll email the owner to get him to speak to his hosting company about responding to MalwareBytes abuse reports", their response is more likely to be "oh I cant access the website, I'll just disable the IP Protection feature." My personal response has been to disable IP Protection, I hope purely for the time being, but which if carried out by an equally frustrated and sizeable enough percentage of your customer-base, would mean that MalwareBytes is investing in developing a product feature / technology that their customers don't use. I apologise if it feels like I'm being pernickety or overly critical - I love MBAM and recommend it endlessly to friends, colleagues and clients alike, I want to be secure in my use of the internet, but I also want some flexibility and control over the processes involved. Mark.