80.67.13.* - whole ip range

[zappe]

80.67.13.* is a ip-range belonging to VPN provider www.privatvpn.se.

This is the ip you get when using their service.

Can you please white list them?

[MysteryFCM]

Not a chance. Both PrivatVPN and Portlane (their upstream) are completely unresponsive to abuse reports, and are housing known criminals.

[zappe]

Not a chance. Both PrivatVPN and Portlane (their upstream) are completely unresponsive to abuse reports, and are housing known criminals.

Well, since they don't log they can't do anything.

Anyway, can I add a ip addess or range manually to ignore list?

[MysteryFCM]

Absolute rubbish, it's their network, and their responsibility. The issues have been reported to them not only by myself, several times (and in the case of Portlane, reports have been sent hundreds of times over the years, with no action and no response, hence my applying the "Criminal friendly" tag to them), with no action and no response.

You're free to add it to the ignore list, yes. You can't add an ignore for a range block however, you'll need to do each IP individually.

Until they start responding to abuse reports, the malware is removed, and the criminal activity ceases, the block won't be removed.

[zappe]

Absolute rubbish, it's their network, and their responsibility. The issues have been reported to them not only by myself, several times (and in the case of Portlane, reports have been sent hundreds of times over the years, with no action and no response, hence my applying the "Criminal friendly" tag to them), with no action and no response.

You're free to add it to the ignore list, yes. You can't add an ignore for a range block however, you'll need to do each IP individually.

Until they start responding to abuse reports, the malware is removed, and the criminal activity ceases, the block won't be removed.

I see your point, I just said that since they don't keeps logs they can't suspend users. They prefer anonymity like TOR or I2P.

As long as they are not obligated by law to keep logs I don't think they will start responding.

I guess I have to add it to ignore list.

[MysteryFCM]

Whether they're obligated by law or not is irrelevant, as an ASN, they're obligated by the rules they agree to when leasing IP ranges, and the rules they agree to when peering with other ASNs, and those obligations include the termination of those found involved in criminal and malicious activity. Should they not do so, they're subject to de-peering and losing their IP ranges.