Jump to content

mbam-dor.exe detected as keylogger by Panda antivirus


Recommended Posts

It's obviously a False Positive, and moreover Panda is the only AV "detecting" it:

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/2be1057...622ed327764dfe1

Interestingly, the latest version of the file is no longer detected, implying in the process that you need to install the latest version of MBAM as well... :P

Happy Holidays!

X-Mas%20Reindeer.gif

Dr.Web, PrevXCSI, IKARUS and others already was fixed their def for mbam.exe, mbam-dor.exe, etc...

malwarebytesantimalwarenl1.jpg

28010770ik5.jpg

VirusTotal report from 06.10.2008

http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic173000.html

My report from 28.10.2008 is 0/38 0%...

48289292lp2.jpg

The problem with PANDA and Twister Anti-TrojanVirus defs is from 27.10.2008(or earlier) and they do nothing about to fix this issue ;(

Definitely false positive.

Merry Christmas ! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's obviously a False Positive, and moreover Panda is the only AV "detecting" it:

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/2be1057...622ed327764dfe1

Interestingly, the latest version of the file is no longer detected, implying in the process that you need to install the latest version of MBAM as well... :P

Happy Holidays!

X-Mas%20Reindeer.gif

Hello i just updated my mbam and then scanned the file mbam-dor.exe and it is still detected by panda virustotal scan report

Is it correct that the current version should be 1.31 and the database version 1544? I seem to have those installed. I can complain to panda but i dont know if they listen to my complaints because i use their free service called panda activescan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it correct that the current version should be 1.31 and the database version 1544?

Yes, that's correct, but I just noticed that my version of the file is a slightly different size, and the creation date also differs slightly from yours, although version nr. is 1.0.0.0 for both... :P We probably need the input of one of the developers to make sense of that.

I can complain to panda but i dont know if they listen to my complaints because i use their free service called panda activescan.

Not at all: all AV vendors are eager to correct FPs, regardless of who reports them; It wouldn't reflect favorably on them if they didn't

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that's correct, but I just noticed that my version of the file is a slightly different size, and the creation date also differs slightly from yours, although version nr. is 1.0.0.0 for both... :P We probably need the input of one of the developers to make sense of that.

Not at all: all AV vendors are eager to correct FPs, regardless of who reports them; It wouldn't reflect favorably on them if they didn't

Hmm i hope that my file is legitimate though... yeah but if you could ask from the developers that would be good. Thanks. Well i gotta go now. Good night to everyone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.