zappe Posted December 30, 2010 ID:367709 Share Posted December 30, 2010 Non-authoritative answer:Name: kickasstorrents.comAddresses: 212.117.174.34 193.105.134.8515:15:49 zappe IP-BLOCK 212.117.174.34 (Type: outgoing, Port: 58826, Process: firefox.exe)15:15:49 zappe IP-BLOCK 193.105.134.85 (Type: outgoing, Port: 58827, Process: firefox.exe)Are you censoring? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zappe Posted January 6, 2011 Author ID:370527 Share Posted January 6, 2011 Any news? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zappe Posted January 13, 2011 Author ID:373567 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Any news? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysteryFCM Posted January 14, 2011 ID:373782 Share Posted January 14, 2011 Apologies for missing this one. This is not an F/P however. The IP is living on a root eSolutions range, which is an ISP well known for housing malicious content (and kickasstorrents.com itself isn't exactly known for being legit either) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zappe Posted January 14, 2011 Author ID:373840 Share Posted January 14, 2011 Apologies for missing this one. This is not an F/P however. The IP is living on a root eSolutions range, which is an ISP well known for housing malicious content (and kickasstorrents.com itself isn't exactly known for being legit either)But 193.105.134.85 is not i root's range. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysteryFCM Posted January 14, 2011 ID:373841 Share Posted January 14, 2011 The first IP is root eSolutions, the second is Portlane, which is just as bad.If you'd like to ignore the warning, you are of course, free to add it to the exclusion list. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zappe Posted January 14, 2011 Author ID:373844 Share Posted January 14, 2011 The first IP is root eSolutions, the second is Portlane, which is just as bad.If you'd like to ignore the warning, you are of course, free to add it to the exclusion list.Yeah, i saw that the second was as bad. http://google.com/safebrowsing/diagnostic?site=AS:42708As a swede i though Portlane was better, i need to contact them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MysteryFCM Posted January 14, 2011 ID:373845 Share Posted January 14, 2011 No problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now