rf6lic.exe

[zxcdsa]

This file has been analysed by Symantec and Kaspersky and removed from their data base, false positive. Thanks!

Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.46

www.malwarebytes.org

Database version: 4152

Windows 6.1.7600

Internet Explorer 8.0.7600.16385

29/05/2010 10:17:51 AM

mbam-log-2010-05-29 (10-17-51).txt

Scan type: Full scan (C:\|)

Objects scanned: 174205

Time elapsed: 16 minute(s), 57 second(s)

Memory Processes Infected: 0

Memory Modules Infected: 0

Registry Keys Infected: 0

Registry Values Infected: 0

Registry Data Items Infected: 0

Folders Infected: 0

Files Infected: 1

Memory Processes Infected:

(No malicious items detected)

Memory Modules Infected:

(No malicious items detected)

Registry Keys Infected:

(No malicious items detected)

Registry Values Infected:

(No malicious items detected)

Registry Data Items Infected:

(No malicious items detected)

Folders Infected:

(No malicious items detected)

Files Infected:

C:\Users\USER\Documents\RoboForm (2)\rf6lic.exe (RiskWare.Tool.CK) -> No action taken. [ABB3BCEE48B4032190579EEC31C835EB]

[nosirrah]

Is this a modified version of the original file by any chance?

[zxcdsa]

Is this a modified version of the original file by any chance?

No, it isn't. It's strange how it's being detected by MB all of a sudden, it's been on my PC for ages. : -)

[miekiemoes]

Hi,

This file is used to crack roboform and Malwarebytes is not the only scanner detecting it:

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/436b7ff...ea67-1275102399

We won"t remove detection since cracks are always a risk, hence the name "RiskWare.Tool.CK"

[zxcdsa]

Hi,

This file is used to crack roboform and Malwarebytes is not the only scanner detecting it:

http://www.virustotal.com/analisis/436b7ff...ea67-1275102399

We won"t remove detection since cracks are always a risk, hence the name "RiskWare.Tool.CK"

Yeah well, I think I should stop submitting here. I sent the file to both Kaspersky and Symantec, and both replied saying that the file was neither infected nor malicious, and was removed from their data bases. (Kaspersky didn't even have it there in the first place, and Symantec originally had it as a 'potential' risk, but have subsequently removed the false detection).

It's cool with me if you want to be the internet police, but I think you should only be detecting infected files.

I'd like to use the context of this post to quote in another forum, but I ask for your permission first if you would let me know.

Thanks for you help and time, I do appreciate it.

[nosirrah]

You can quote this :

Cracks and gens are malicious with such frequency that our position is to default detect both to protect our users and to discourage this dangerous activity.

[zxcdsa]

You can quote this :

Cracks and gens are malicious with such frequency that our position is to default detect both to protect our users and to discourage this dangerous activity.

I will. You "default detect"? OK.

[nosirrah]

No, the full statement as that includes why.

[zxcdsa]

OK I'll add the file to the ignore list, thanks again for your help.