Site throw an error by browser guard.

[cachi_ree813]

Hello! browser guard.
I have an issue with browser guard.
When I access smsonline, I encounter the following error message, and the page doesn't function properly. Even after adding `html-load.com` to the allow list, the issue is not resolved.

[cachi_ree813]

screenshot:

[Porthos]

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. I understand how frustrating it can be when a site you frequently use is not functioning properly due to our browser blocker extension.

The reason you're experiencing this problem is that our extension is currently blocking certain domains, specifically

html-load.com

and

css-load.com

These domains have been identified as sources that may display or sideload ads without the user's knowledge. To maintain a secure and seamless browsing experience for all users, we have chosen to block these domains by default.

While it's possible for you to whitelist these domains locally in your settings, we generally do not recommend doing so. Allowing these domains may expose you to unwanted advertisements or other potentially intrusive content.

We appreciate your understanding and are here to help if you have any other questions or need further assistance.

[cachi_ree813]

I added it to the allow list, but it's still being blocked.

[Porthos]

fb.html-load.com
content-loader.com
fb.content-loader.com

Add these as well.

Or just turn off ad's/trakerss on the site.

[cachi_ree813]

The error still persists.

[Porthos]

3 minutes ago, Porthos said:

Or just turn off ad's/trakerss on the site.

If you have premium, you will have to add it to that as well.

 

[cachi_ree813]

If I turn it off, I'll be exposed to ads. Is this how it's supposed to work?

[cachi_ree813]

Is there any other way?

[Porthos]

1 minute ago, cachi_ree813 said:

If I turn it off, I'll be exposed to ads. Is this how it's supposed to work?

These sites are using anti-blocker tech on the sites.

1 minute ago, cachi_ree813 said:

Is there any other way?

You are only doing it on sites that use the same techniques to keep us from not having the ads.

[cachi_ree813]

Do I have to disable the browser guard's ad/tracker blocking feature just to use the website?  
If so, how is that any different from turning off browser guard completely??

[Porthos]

1 minute ago, cachi_ree813 said:

Do I have to disable the browser guard's ad/tracker blocking feature just to use the website?  
If so, how is that any different from turning off browser guard completely??

Turning it off completely will not protect you from other sites that are not forcing us to turn off ad blocking.

[cachi_ree813]

So every time I visit this site, I have to disable ad/tracking, and then re-enable it when using other sites. Is this inconvenience something users are just expected to deal with?

Is it difficult to implement a global exception for this site?

[Porthos]

Just now, cachi_ree813 said:

o every time I visit this site, I have to disable ad/tracking, and then re-enable it when using other sites.

Turning off on that site only affects that site. And it will stick until you reset Browser Guard for some reason.

[cachi_ree813]

So, you're saying that when using sites similar to smsonline, the same issue occurs. I want to apply the domain to the allow list to solve this issue, but it seems the allow list isn't functioning properly.

[cachi_ree813]

As more sites like this emerge, user inconvenience is likely to increase.

Possible solutions include

1. Enhancing browser guard's ad-blocking technology to resolve the issue.
2. Modifying Firefox's allow list feature.
3. Globally allowing html-load.com to eliminate inconvenience for users like myself.
 

For now, I'm not satisfied with browser guard's solution, so I plan to use adguard instead.

[Porthos]

3 minutes ago, cachi_ree813 said:

so I plan to use adguard instead.

They bent over to the anti-adblocking company and do not block them anymore.

1 hour ago, Porthos said:

Allowing these domains may expose you to unwanted advertisements or other potentially intrusive content.