Jump to content

Website false positive

Go to solution Solved by BjelakovicL,

Recommended Posts

I have reported this upstream on urlscan.io.

However, that website specifically states:

"A: We don't recommend using the "malicious" verdict as an unattended blocking signal since our detection can ocassionally return false positive verdicts. The best way to make use of the verdicts is to feed them into a manual review process. Furthermore, we only return phishing and impersonation verdicts for the brands that we are tracking."

Why is Malwarebytes using results there uncritically, rather than using manual review as they state downstream users should be?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Back to top
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.