Jump to content

Adobe Acrobat Pro XI Activator


Recommended Posts

This file is reported as clean by my Kaspersky Antivirus, NOD32, Bitdefender


It is flagged by my Norton AV and by my Webroot SecureAnywhere AV though so I put it on the ignore list


Since the big sharks like Kaspersky don't detect it, I believe this is a false positive with no real harm?


Need your expert advice on what this file does please as I am no programmer and don't know what it is altering


SHA256: 46067bcde7fb1006430f97c286d7ac8de915315291c6c542567ae73939f848c8 File name: adobe.acrobat.xi.pro.patch-MPT.exe Detection ratio: 26 / 50 Analysis date: 2014-01-30 16:25:15 UTC ( 1 hour, 49 minutes ago )



PE signature block
Publisher MPT34M
Product Activator
Original name Activator
Internal name MPT34M
File version 1.0
Description cr4cking th3 cod3 4 fun!


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't need help with pirated software, I just wanna start using my lifetime license for MBAM but so many false positives


I love how MBAM works to remove threats I just wish it removes real viruses not FPs man


Again, I don't want help with pirated software, this is about saying a file is harmful when it may or may not really be so

Link to post
Share on other sites

so MBAM is for detecting cracks or real viruses?


This is why I don't use MBAM even though I have a lifetime license, I just wish it could really tell me when I have a virus not a bunch of activator or harmless tracks


at the end of the day, MBAM is not DMCA, it's a security product to detect threats


I do understand that some activators or "cracks" are really harmful and thus I wanted to report these to differentiate between the threats and leave the cracks part to its own

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly why I stopped using MBAM! and this enforces my detection! Thank you, I own a computer website / forum and will let people know how MBAM is the highest FP security product out there.


Thank you for your fast and useless replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We detect Malware, which is ANYTHING that is a risk for the user. This to keep our users safe.

keeping users safe from a crack that doesn't do any harm?? riiiiight


this makes me not trust your product and stick to the big security names that know what they're doing


Kaspersky, having a consisten track record in the AV Comparatives tests as shown here for detecting 100% of the viruses and 0 false positives never detects these as either viruses or cracks, they pass the detection


see here: AV-Comparatives - Real World Tests


so please your justification doesn't make sense. Users WANT to be informed if a crack or activator is actually harmful, but there is no sense in simply detecting it as a crack if it does no harm

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
Back to top
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.