Jump to content

Version 1.34: CNET Exclusive


Recommended Posts

I had to download version 1.34 (installed over 1.33), the automatic update didn't find it (I only tried once) ; the image says "exclusive" on download.com, this may be the cause. :)

There are many differences, and 1.34 is faster. Here is the changelog, embedded in the setup :

Version 1.34 (February 11th, 2009)

1. (FIXED) Removing registry keys with corrupt permissions.

2. (FIXED) Removal of drivers now improved.

3. (FIXED) Improved memory usage (more to come!)

4. (FIXED) Certain types of freezing during full scan.

5. (FIXED) Improved full scan times significantly.

6. (ADDED) Better detection techniques for the real-time protection module.

7. (ADDED) Directories now counted as items scanned.

8. (ADDED) Disinfection for certain USB spread infections (Conficker).

9. (ADDED) New command line parameter: /schedule (see help file).

Link to post
  • 1 month later...

THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT BINARY VERSIONS OF MBAM V1.34 FLOATING AROUND THE NET!!!

BEST TECHIE:

http://www.besttechie.net/tools/mbam-setup.exe

BLEEPING COMPUTER:

http://download.bleepingcomputer.com/malwa.../mbam-setup.exe

DOWNLOAD.COM:

http://download.cnet.com/Malwarebytes-Anti...&tag=button

WHO CAN WE TRUST???

MBAM'S WEBSITE LINKS TO DOWNLOAD.COM. THE OTHER TWO ARE VERY QUESTIONABLE SITES, BUT EACH GIVE A DIFFERENT BINARY, WILL THE REAL MBAM V1.34 PLEASE STAND UP!!

Link to post
THERE ARE THREE DIFFERENT BINARY VERSIONS OF MBAM V1.34 FLOATING AROUND THE NET!!!

BEST TECHIE:

http://www.besttechie.net/tools/mbam-setup.exe

BLEEPING COMPUTER:

http://download.bleepingcomputer.com/malwa.../mbam-setup.exe

DOWNLOAD.COM:

http://download.cnet.com/Malwarebytes-Anti...&tag=button

WHO CAN WE TRUST???

MBAM'S WEBSITE LINKS TO DOWNLOAD.COM. THE OTHER TWO ARE VERY QUESTIONABLE SITES, BUT EACH GIVE A DIFFERENT BINARY, WILL THE REAL MBAM V1.34 PLEASE STAND UP!!

The owners of the other two sites:

Besttechie: Malwarebytes member profile > Administrators

Bleeping Computer: Malwarebytes member profile > Experts

I think you'll find they're not "QUESTIONABLE SITES" B)

Link to post

At the Major Geeks site, i downloaded from two of the links they provided and got the same binaries.

But it was a different binary than the prior three links!!! Now we have FOUR DIFFERENT BINARIES on the web!!

SecurityWonks & GT500.org each provide the same binary, NOT the same BINARY as Major Geeks' site though.

These two sites have the same binary as Download.com's site.

You guys are dodging the REAL question here, that is: WHY are the binaries different in the first place!???

This is FULL OF BULL ****, and all you guys talk about is how wonderful the sites are...

We cannot TRUST MalwareBytes.

Link to post

Well, i tried one of the many variants of MBAM and it was very weak, so weak in fact i downloaded & installed Avast! FREE Home Ed.

This quickly disposed of the UAC virus and some others i had laying in some obscure archives i had downloaded some time ago.

Avast! gave no problems at all and does a lot more than Malware's MBAM does.

I'll trust professionals more than a ".org" who acts exactly like a ".com" and wants $$$, Malware's website won't even name the place of or people in it's company.

As for affiliate embedding, um sure, wonder why anyone would trust that kind of slick software sales & marketing.

IMO.

Link to post
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.