Jump to content

captfbgnet

Honorary Members
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by captfbgnet

  1. exile360, your answers are extremely complete, detailed and easy to understand. I hope there is a way for your answers to be 'pinned' somehow to these types of questions. Thanks again.
  2. Thank you exile360 for a most in depth and complete answer. Great job. One question, if one is using a vpn (NordVPN for example) is one faced with the same issues that "guard' protects from or does the 'vpn' protect against these types of attacks because of the encryption and the 'false' IP address??
  3. Rather than using another 'extension' any chance that this 'Guard' will be "built-into" the premium version of Malwarebytes at a future date? So I guess the question is, why not include it in as a Malwarebyte update?
  4. Is malwarebytes Browser Guard included/part of the Malwarebytes premium app or does it have to be installed in 'addition to' ?
  5. Followed your step # 1 and it worked! Thanks for the support and very quick response. It was great and much appreciated.
  6. Same problem here this morning after updating premium win7 64x version. Had pop-up update notification.
  7. Have licensed premium version (Win7 64x). Had update program notification this morning. After doing so, the program won't start and says 'can't connect to server". Please help ASAP. Tks..
  8. Same experience as Sarton with MSE and MBAM. Have both running for yrs and no problems. Just make sure 'schedule scans' are NOT schedule at the same time. I too remember reading something about MSE not being as capable as other antivirus programs in real-time detection and protection. My take away after reading that article was to always practice good internet surfing, email, opening attachments, etc etiquette. MSE is user-friendly and doesn't take over your computer like so many other antivirus programs do. True it may not be in the top rated programs, but running alongside of MBAM, I haven't had any problems. Just my $.02 worth.
  9. Tks Firefox. It worked. I thought I had already tried that setting, but got no results. This morning however, I checked the 'log file' and found that the program ran on schedule and then 'disappeared' as I had hoped.
  10. WIN7:SP1:IE9: Is there a way to have MBAM 1.51 close the 'quick scanner screen' after the scan finishes (when no threat is found), rather than having to do it yourself? I tried various scanner settings to do this (no boot however) but can't find the right setting. I have scanner settings to run automatically, but would like the scanner screens to close if no threats are found. A log file is still created.
  11. WIN7:SP1:IE9: Is there a way to have MBAM 1.51 close the 'quick scanner screen' after the scan finishes (when no threat is found), rather than having to do it yourself? I tried various scanner settings to do this (no boot however) but can't find the right setting. I have scanner settings to run automatically, but would like the scanner screens to close if no threats are found. A log file is still created.
  12. [edit] original post removed and the following posted by Ron Lewis Thank you for taking the time and caring to help others captfbgnet. However posting emails in public is actually protected and not allowed in some countries. In most cases simply restarting the computer will work, in others the MBAM-CLEAN process as explained above should correct it. Thank you again. Cheers
  13. This sounds similar to the same problem listed by Rod123 in his 12-22-10 posting and the subsequest postings of captfbgnet. Could these be related to some type of 'bug' also? The problem still exists. Tks...
  14. Seems like an "axe solution since all worked well with 1.46 & 1.50. The 'on-going issue seems to be with IOLO (System Mechanic) changing the above two reg entries, and MBAM scan thinks original keys are 'infected because of the change by IOLO and thus the error message. Toggleing back and forth with both programs has verified this problem. MBAM simply needs to 'ignore' this issue , but does not. Can you think of anything else beside the above? Thanks
  15. Here is the files that you requested. Both 'registry data items. are listed under "Ignore" tab Protection Log 2010-12-23 00:00:10 captfbgnet MESSAGE Scheduled update executed successfully 00:00:45 captfbgnet MESSAGE IP Protection stopped 00:00:47 captfbgnet MESSAGE Database updated successfully 00:00:47 captfbgnet MESSAGE IP Protection started successfully Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.50.1.1100 www.malwarebytes.org Database version: 5382 Windows 6.1.7600 Internet Explorer 8.0.7600.16385 12/23/2010 7:51:43 AM mbam-log-2010-12-23 (07-51-27).txt Scan type: Quick scan Objects scanned: 143339 Time elapsed: 4 minute(s), 23 second(s) Memory Processes Infected: 0 Memory Modules Infected: 0 Registry Keys Infected: 0 Registry Values Infected: 0 Registry Data Items Infected: 2 Folders Infected: 0 Files Infected: 0 Memory Processes Infected: (No malicious items detected) Memory Modules Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Keys Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Values Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Data Items Infected: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\scrfile\shell\open\command\(default) (Broken.OpenCommand) -> Bad: (NOTEPAD.EXE %1) Good: ("%1" /S) -> No action taken. HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell\open\command\(default) (Broken.OpenCommand) -> Bad: (NOTEPAD.EXE %1) Good: (regedit.exe "%1") -> No action taken. Folders Infected: (No malicious items detected) Files Infected: (No malicious items detected)
  16. Win 7; MBAM 1.50.1: Same problem here. Although problems added to the "Ignore" tab ( and they show up there) a re-scan finds the same issue. They don't appear to be 'ignored.' For me, both issues are the result of some software changes ( IOLO) but not REAL threats, thus the use of the "Ignore" tab. Thanks for any help
  17. Win 7; MBAM 1.50.1: Same problem here. Although problems added to the "Ignore" tab ( and they show up there) a re-scan finds the same issue. They don't appear to be 'ignored.' For me, both issues are the result of some software changes ( IOLO) but not REAL threats, thus the use of the "Ignore" tab. Thanks for any help
  18. Wow, what a terriffic reply and youre right, I do use IOLO software. Thanks for your outstanding advise and quick reply. MBAM is great!
  19. WIN 7: New MBAM upgrade found these two items as 'malicious software.' Didn't have this issue with 1.46 or 1.50. Here is the log file: Looks like a false positive to me. See near bottom: Registry Data Items Infected. Help appreciated. Thank you... Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.50.1.1100 www.malwarebytes.org Database version: 5377 Windows 6.1.7600 Internet Explorer 8.0.7600.16385 12/22/2010 12:58:08 PM mbam-log-2010-12-22 (12-57-38).txt Scan type: Flash scan Objects scanned: 100426 Time elapsed: 39 second(s) Memory Processes Infected: 0 Memory Modules Infected: 0 Registry Keys Infected: 0 Registry Values Infected: 0 Registry Data Items Infected: 2 Folders Infected: 0 Files Infected: 0 Memory Processes Infected: (No malicious items detected) Memory Modules Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Keys Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Values Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Data Items Infected:HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\scrfile\shell\open\command\(default) (Broken.OpenCommand) -> Bad: (NOTEPAD.EXE %1) Good: ("%1" /S) -> No action taken. HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell\open\command\(default) (Broken.OpenCommand) -> Bad: (NOTEPAD.EXE %1) Good: (regedit.exe "%1") -> No action taken. Folders Infected: (No malicious items detected) Files Infected: (No malicious items detected) mbam_log_2010_12_22__12_57_38_.txt
  20. Thanks for the VIP info. My appreciation for Malwarebytes grows
  21. Thanks Firefox for your answer. I appreciate the clarification.
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.