Jump to content

DavidWCooney

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by DavidWCooney

  1. This is unfortunate. While Linux may be "more" protected by design, it still has vulnerabilities. Beyond that, however, is the fact that I interact with non Linux users all the time and I could inadvertently share a malicious file that doesn't impact my computer with other vulnerable computers on the network simply because I don't have an anti-malware solution for my computer. This is clearly a known possibility because you offer anti-malware solutions for businesses that have Linux servers on their networks. It is truly sad that it appears that there won't be an anti-malware solution for home Linux users until some incident occurs - in other words, when it's too late.

  2. Malwarebytes has offered protection for Linux for businesses for quite some time. Home Linux users know protection is needed for Linux, but anti-malware companies believe we all live in a fantasy world where Linux is "inherently safe." No. We need a good anti-malware option for home use because EVERY operating system has vulnerabilities. I have a fairly new computer that still runs great but can't run Windows 11. I'm going to install Linux on it because it still has years of valuable use left. I need an Linux anti-malware option and there just isn't one out there. We need something better than ClamTK!

    Come on, Malwarebytes. Beat the others to this small but growing market. PLEASE!!!

    • Like 2
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.