Jump to content

DavidWCooney

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DavidWCooney

  1. This is unfortunate. While Linux may be "more" protected by design, it still has vulnerabilities. Beyond that, however, is the fact that I interact with non Linux users all the time and I could inadvertently share a malicious file that doesn't impact my computer with other vulnerable computers on the network simply because I don't have an anti-malware solution for my computer. This is clearly a known possibility because you offer anti-malware solutions for businesses that have Linux servers on their networks. It is truly sad that it appears that there won't be an anti-malware solution for home Linux users until some incident occurs - in other words, when it's too late.
  2. @AdvancedSetup I LOVE your avatar!
  3. @DarthKeks I use Linux Mint too. In fact, I'm currently on my Linux Mint laptop now. Similar to my home computer, it couldn't run Windows 10, but it is still working great. I just wish I had a good anti-malware option for it.
  4. Malwarebytes has offered protection for Linux for businesses for quite some time. Home Linux users know protection is needed for Linux, but anti-malware companies believe we all live in a fantasy world where Linux is "inherently safe." No. We need a good anti-malware option for home use because EVERY operating system has vulnerabilities. I have a fairly new computer that still runs great but can't run Windows 11. I'm going to install Linux on it because it still has years of valuable use left. I need an Linux anti-malware option and there just isn't one out there. We need something better than ClamTK! Come on, Malwarebytes. Beat the others to this small but growing market. PLEASE!!!
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.