Jump to content

Ruffles

Members
  • Posts

    14
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. It's now been, depending on what Kaspersky patch troubles began for you, it's either one or two Kaspersky patches, that still conflict. Kaspersky is well aware of the conflict, & seem to place, fixing on the back burner. MBAM is a competitor.
  2. All software has the potential to conflict with each update. Customer complaints, help bring attention so the next update fixes. Kaspersky they have somewhat of a different attitude, or not enough complaints to motivate. BD was known previously to be very buggy, they've cleaned it up. I would imagine arrogance, (not fixing) becomes greater as market share grows.
  3. @Elektra - I had the same issue, almost immediate lock up, do to the non compatible, software. I was able to (very first thing r-click MBAM tray icon quit, then deleted. Also KIS 2020 is now at patch (g) one machine they play well, two others not good. On two machines I'm using WD + hard_configurator + MBAM hard_confiurator - really does a nice job of locking down WD (by design), see https://hard-configurator.com/ with free h_c on nothing can install. One button switches off/on, so you, can DL something new, it will White list your apps on install. All my machines except one I've ditched KIS in favor of BD, it plays nice with MBAM 4x
  4. Installed, asks untick 'shortcut' making, scans for 'white list, choose recommended. Configurator, has configure WD buit in: So far so good first minue or two
  5. Thanks Exile! I'll report back on the configuartor
  6. OK. I've done this, WD is now AV & MBAM is active in sys tray. Do you have an opinion on hard_confuatror see: https://hard-configurator.com mentioned in thread post #15. I would try all modes except MAX.
  7. see: https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/mbam-as-an-av.424089/#post-2878899
  8. Yes! Like an onion. Seems MBAM slowly adding layers, but not quite, on par with with competitors.
  9. Thanks! Saves uninstalling MBAM, WD becomes the AV satisfying, the little white shield. I'll most likely do that!!! The option you (thank you) is not an option, with full fledged AV's. Is it fair to say, your skeptical MBAM stand alone AV, & WD may need assistance, so MBAM? Thank You, chat perhaps tomorrow Ruffles
  10. Hmm! Seems like if your going to register as AV protection, with 'Windows Security Center' then your an AV, or pretending to be an AV and/or avoid testing! If you place a green check mark in that, little white shield, your saying your an AV. Years ago it was (resident) AV, AS, FW, consolidation/buy outs, combined all three, in to an AV. Now MBAM is it an AV & AS or AS pretending to be an AV? Heuristics everyone has! See: https://www.wilderssecurity.com/threads/mbam-as-an-av.424089/ & You use MBAM on demand or resident? Also WD has come along way, but still tests, not as well as competition, so says AV comparatives, VB, Consumers Reports, etc. Allot of this is akin to the better speaker HiFi, mine is better, as it can produce more sounds/frequencies, (that humans cannot heat) than yours can. Argument about nothing! I believe if MBAM want's to satisfy that little white shield: I should, show it's power, 'real world testing', 'false positives', 'system resources', '0-day or heuristic', be tested, like AC-C, VB, etc. I'll bet a dollar to a doughnut, that future versions MBAM, will add FW, etc. It was a slow incorporation into MBAM, MBAM anti exploit (previously, ZeroVulnerabities), ADW cleaner. MBAM morphing from, AS to AV. Following AV, AS, FW, & hardening techniques, I've never been infected, sans pups/adware. Take Care/Happy Holidays/Enjoy the banter (similar to who's better Ford or Chevy) Ruffles
  11. Hi Neighbor, Georgetown, TX here! Seems pretty divided at Wilders, yes only, MBAM, no AV + MBAM. Do u use MBAM stand alone. Is that what, this community & staff use MBAM alone? I understand mileage may vary. Will MBAM make it to AV Comparatives, would that be fair evaluation?
  12. Ok! What to use for Tbird? Also sure this is asked allot (mixed opinions at Wilderssecurity) can/is equal to stand alone AV's?
  13. Does MBAM 4.x address spam & phishing for Thunderbird & Gmail?
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.