Jump to content

selma

Members
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by selma

  1. What about this answer, straight from Kaspersky:

    https://forum.kaspersky.com/index.php?/topic/395651-malwarebytes-compatibility-issues-merged/&do=findComment&comment=2803557

    "Kaspersky Tech Support responded and said that Kaspersky Total Security and Mawarebytes Premium are not compatible and I cannot run both live at the same time."

    I am pretty sure   that if you continue disabling things in Kaspersky, eventually you will have a malformed antivirus happily running alongside Malwarebytes Pro....

     

  2. 18 minutes ago, Davidtoo said:

    Really,  If every computer user on the planet knows this, why don't the experts at malwarebytes know this?

    Because they need to sell product which is not anymore minimalist like version 1.75 but not yet a fully flagged antivirus, to be used alone.

    So, they try to push this "compatibility " thing, claiming that Malwarebytes was designed  to be compatible with all other anti-viruses  (maybe this was a valid statement for version1.75)

    Now, the anti-viruses are increasingly complex and they cover basically all aspects of malware fighting and there is nothing left for Malwarebytes to "detect"

    Kaspersky by itself is a "monster", with 100% detection on all possible tests. What do you hope to accomplish running Malwarebytes on top of it????

  3. 15 minutes ago, exile360 said:

    It looks like it's the HIPS component in Kaspersky detecting/blocking Malwarebytes

    exile360, you DO realize that is a lost battle to fight with each and every antivirus  suggesting "add this" or "exclude that" in order to make Malwarebytes "compatible", when every computer user on this planet is well aware that shouldn't run two antimalware with real time protection at the same time...

    What about tomorrow, when the antivirus will update a module ? Now what, start all over again???

    Where do we stop, acknowledging that is not advisable to run Malwarebytes pro and another antivirus simultaneously????

  4. 9 hours ago, exile360 said:

    Since Malwarebytes isn't an AV[...] it's not surprising at all that it did poorly in a test designed to test AV engines

    If it is not an antivirus, what was the point of testing it in an environment "designed" to test AV engines???

     

    9 hours ago, exile360 said:

    (nor have they ever claimed that it was)

    Enough with this already !!!

    All over the place Malwarebytes is being advertised as a "antivirus replacement", so a software which can replace your antivirus. Of course, you cannot replace your antivirus with a "text editor" let's say, you have to replace it with a software which have antivirus functionality.

    That was the reason Malwarebytes was tested in AV Test, to prove the point; the results are not stellar but average at best.

    Even you, multiple times advised people here, on this forum, that they do not need an antivirus, Malwarebytes being sufficient.

     

  5. 13 hours ago, David H. Lipman said:

    Malwarebytes has to know the URL of the malicious or nefarious content.

    Please supply the URL...

    So now the users have to supply the "infected URL"  ?  Malwarebytes is a paid product not an open-source software.

    The OP's statement summarized very well: " My Anti-Malware don't work but I have a pay licence (60 Euros) "

Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.