Jump to content

Amaroq_Starwind

Honorary Members
  • Posts

    700
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Amaroq_Starwind

  1. Yeah, I think you might be right. I looked up Zingtree, and it seems to be some kind of plug-in for support tools based on decision trees, or something like that.
  2. Give us one of these Zingtree URLs, with the wrapped in the following tag: [code]<some URL> [/code]
  3. This should probably go in the Comments and Suggestions section. This actually already exists as part of the Malwarebytes Toolset, aka Malwarebytes Techbench. However, it's not available for normal consumers, you need to be the owner of (or work for) a computer repair shop and sign up for the Techbench program.
  4. So, I was trying to send some money to my friend, but both Malwareybtes itself and the Malwarebytes chrome extension separately blocked the website https://cash.me when I tried to use it.
  5. Avast and Malwarebytes have no conflicts with eachother regardless of which versions you are using, unless they detect eachother through flawed definitions, but that hasn't happened in a long time.
  6. I know that programs like Sandboxie already exist, and recently Microsoft announced the Windows Sandbox, but... Is there any chance that Malwarebytes' Anti-Exploit measures be expanded to include pre-configured Sandbox environments for apps like Java, Adobe Flash/Acrobat, Skype, and the like, which could automatically initiate when those programs are launched? Those applications all seem fairly vulnerable, but are widely used, and for the most part should still run fine in a Sandbox environment. And when you look at the recently developed Windows Sandbox, it quickly becomes evident that it's actually very possible to run Sandboxes efficiently... especially if they're specifically configured for specific applications. So, does a Malwarebytes Sandbox seem like it would be a good idea and/or worthwhile investment, or is it far enough outside the purview of Malwarebytes to remain a task delegated to external software such as Sandboxie?
  7. MBOS: Malwarebytes Operating System MBFE: Malwarebytes File Explorer MBIB: Malwarebytes Internet Browser MBRE: Malwarebytes Registry Editor
  8. Can you think of any ways you'd make use of TxF, if you were a software developer?
  9. Looks like another type of vulnerability that Malwarebytes will have to look out for in the future.
  10. Noted. I had just figured that since we had licenses, there wasn't anything wrong with using them as long as we didn't let anyone else use them. I'll probably bring that up with him when I get the chance. I appreciate the advice!
  11. 13 this time, eh? Yum~ If you ever break your record, let us know.
  12. Malwarebytes uses signature-less detection, so it doesn't need a lot of data to work with. The official Malwarebytes toolset offered to techshop specialists includes a portable version of the Malwarebytes scanner, which works wonders, and none of the tools provided by Malwarebytes actually require an internet connection to function. It is still recommended for complete functionality, but you can install Malwarebytes on a computer that's in complete networking lockdown an run it without issue.
  13. Hello, all! So, you may have noticed a new piece of art in my forum signature: This was actually drawn by my friend @ToxicBlitzX3. If anyone here also has art to share, be it their own creation, a commission, or a gift, want to share it? As is the rule on the forum, please keep it clean!
  14. Let's just hope that it's good enough to fool sandbox-aware malware~ The fact Windows Defender can also run partially sandboxed now is pretty awesome as well.
  15. I just really hate seeing things like TxF and WinFS fizzle out and die. It is honestly depressing to see that much work go into something, and then it either gets completely unused (in the case of TxF) or outright cancelled (WinFS), often because it was ahead of its time in some fashion. I don't want TxF to go the way of WinFS, and that's why I want to see more things use it even if it would be seemingly redundant.
  16. My dad's an MSDN subscriber, though, and we already run Enterprise versions of Windows on most of our computers at home. But now that you mention the whole piracy thing, I guess it's better safe than sorry. Maybe I should just use Pro in that case.
  17. Maybe I'll install the 64-bit version of Windows 10 Enterprise when I finally get an SSD (a 500 gigabyte SSD is somehow only $80, and would be a huge improvement over the current 160 gigabyte hard disk), then I can work on backing up everything from the old installation. I do wish there was an automatic utility for restoring data and settings between Windows installations, even for different architectures, as long as you still had your old hard drive handy, but hey... You can't have everything. Since I have an external dock to plug hard drives in, everything should be alright.
  18. Unfortunately, NTVDM x64 has dependencies on leaked Windows NT source code that you need to obtain from elsewhere. As such, the only time I actually want NTVDM, I'm unable to use it on my Windows 7 machine... But when I was given this laptop, it still had a bunch of stuff on it with nowhere to back it up to, and the previous owner had mistakenly installed the 32-bit of Windows 10 on it. And Microsoft, in all their infinite wisdom, made it impossible to upgrade from 32-bit Windows to 64-bit without doing the equivalent of a Reformat and Reinstall.
  19. Drat, another really helpful feature with no 32-bit support... I really wish there was an easier way to migrate from 32-bit installations to 64-bit without losing anything, barring the obvious caveat of having to get fresh drivers.
  20. Weird... it says it will work on 32-bit Windows 7, but only 64-bit Windows 10. Maybe the default settings in 32-bit Windows 10 prevent it from working correctly? I'm going to see if it runs, but if it doesn't, I'm not sure what to try next.
  21. I have come to realize that something like this might also be a beneficial feature to iDevice owners using the Windows-based version of Malwarebytes, but the macOS version would still probably be a much more viable recipient for such a feature.
  22. I forgot, because I'm an idiot sometimes. I kept thinking of OPSWAT instead... >.<
  23. I mean when doing things like trying to restore a maliciously altered file to its original state, trying to correct issues with the registry, having a fallback in the event of false positives, verifying updated components during installation, updating logs, sanitizing and/or immunizing files, etc. If I do come up with something more immediately useful however, I'll make a note of it, but somebody else might figure out that use before I do. Malwarebytes was just one of many examples though, and there are lots of other things that could probably benefit from using TxF. As I said before, Microsoft Office is an example of a program that would hugely benefit from TxF, and the same with any program that stores settings in either an INI file or an XML file.
  24. Says it's for 64-Bit. Currently looking for the 32-Bit version...
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.