Jump to content

lordpake

Honorary Members
  • Posts

    210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by lordpake

  1. Good enough security setup Some little info: Either choose MBAM or SAS for real-time, do not use both! Additional notes: consider using alternative browser, you do not mention this. Using Firefox/Opera/even Safari can lessen the chances of getting infection through drive-by downloads. As IE is the most used and thus the most targeted browser.
  2. Same as this? Let it fix it See nosirrah's response here http://www.malwarebytes.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=6249
  3. She should not use computer w/o antivirus protection. Also firewall + antispyware might be good thing to have too It should also be remembered that no single product catches 100% of the malware. So ditching McAfee because of such single incident may not be the wisest choice IMHO. Also patching OS/Java etc. play a key role in keeping PC safe online.
  4. Beenthere, latest database is 1131 Please update and re-scan in case it's fixed.
  5. Here's my dev log (should have posted that earlier instead, my bad ^^) ---- Malwarebytes' Anti-Malware 1.27 Database version: 1128 Windows 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 8.9.2008 13:04:41 mbam-log-2008-09-08 (13-04-39).txt Scan type: Quick Scan Objects scanned: 47589 Time elapsed: 2 minute(s), 52 second(s) Memory Processes Infected: 0 Memory Modules Infected: 0 Registry Keys Infected: 0 Registry Values Infected: 0 Registry Data Items Infected: 1 Folders Infected: 0 Files Infected: 0 Memory Processes Infected: (No malicious items detected) Memory Modules Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Keys Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Values Infected: (No malicious items detected) Registry Data Items Infected: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\scrfile\shell\open\command\ (Broken.OpenCommand) -> Bad: ("%1" %*) Good: ("%1" /S) -> No action taken. [3974894881707936807878667969840910013986796885748079] Folders Infected: (No malicious items detected) Files Infected: (No malicious items detected)
  6. Old log? Judging from the timestamps. Additionally, your program/database is way old Update through the program and re-scan, just in case it is already taken care of. Latest database 1125 and program is 1.26.
  7. A what? If we are talking about MBAM here, I've never seen anything like that from my KIS.
  8. I subscribed to recent f/p thread here with immediate email notification. However, several posts had been made there, yet I received no notification emails at all? I have correct email address in my profile, and I did check my Gmail spam folder.
  9. Okay, that explains it, thank you. MS-Dos apps I do use every now and then Will restore folder then.
  10. If you find out, care to post here or PM me? As I am also curious as to what might put such folder in my drive I personally consider myself as the cautious type who employs several tools to keep himself safe, plus I don't play with warez. So a mysterious folder in a drive is not what'd expect to find.
  11. Same here. I simply allowed MBAM to deal with it. After all, it was empty folder, and I've had similar detections pointing to few oddly named also empty hidden read-only folders named like files in the past
  12. I for one have absolutely no idea. Though the file in my system has modification date in 2001, which would suggest this might be a file all systems have.
  13. I actually had a similar incident some time ago, 3 of the 4 folder names listed above match those of mine Empty folders named like files. I was able to delete them and all seems okay.
  14. AFAIK there should not be any issues if you use Spybot only as on-demand scanner. Using Teatimer may bring trouble.
  15. You are using very old database. Latest is 1088. Please run the updater within the MBAM and re-scan. AFAIK there was a Bandu-related f/p but that should've been fixed
  16. I can confirm the false positive, also winxp home sp2. Below is attached file from my system, if needed. Plus dev log. oembios.zip mbam_log_08_25_2008__00_25_04_.txt oembios.zip mbam_log_08_25_2008__00_25_04_.txt
  17. So kinda like adding Secunia PSI -like functionality to MBAM? Oh and good to know about the possible IP blocking feature, sounds useful.
  18. Isn't that a malicious Flash code we are talking about now, that is run in browser? And not some piece of malware that is installed/run locally in your machine. AFAIK the Flash 'exploit' is done for when you terminate browser process. I don't see what MBAM could do to prevent that
  19. Never even heard of you, or your software I do frequent some forums etc. and I have never come across any references to either you or your software So, no it's not as bad. I know people behind MBAM by reputation, I don't know you
  20. Well this is a security forum. What do you expect? Post 1 users pimping a custom "build" of security software? Without any sort of official approval! Enthusiastic welcome? More like paranoia is what you get VT link posted by Hardhead obly shows one thing: only heuristic detections from apps that almost always give them, meaning this could still be trojan just one unknown to most vendors.
  21. Well I for one did hit the 'report' button to make sure forum staff is aware of this "custom build".
  22. NO apparent improvement in Quick Scan speed. With only KIS 2009 running (with exlusions for MBAM of course) I still get over 2 and a half minutes runtime for it. Used the built-in updater, all went fine except the new updated MBAM didn't autorun after installation. Is it intended to be this way?
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.