Jump to content

BillH99999

Honorary Members
  • Content Count

    603
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BillH99999

  1. I have tried a couple other org.uk sites that I use and they are blocked as well. If this TLD block was put in intentionally then we need the ability to whitelist an entire TLD as well. It would be crazy to have to whitelist them a site at a time. There are too many legitimate org.uk sites. I'm hoping this was unintentional and it will be fixed soon. Bill
  2. This didn't work for me. It appeared to work until I closed Chrome and reopened it and then the site was blocked again. Bill
  3. I am not blocked in Firefox, only in Chrome. So... we have one person blocked only in Chrome, one blocked only in Firefox, and one not blocked in either. Very strange. Bill
  4. I'm still getting blocked also. I am not running Bitdefender on my PC. Also those posts on the forum are from 2018 and 2019. I just starting being blocked today. It worked fine for me for years until today. Bill
  5. I was trying to go to was the forum. The URL is https://www.fhug.org.uk/forum/. Bill
  6. Please whitelist this site. It is a user group for the software Family Historian. I have been using this site for over 10 years. Browser guard has never blocked it until today.
  7. @mightaswell OK, well I've never paused updates so I don't think that was my problem. Bill
  8. I thought these settings only controlled how long you could pause a hold for. I didn't think they actually caused the hold to pause. To do that I thought you had to actually select a date in the drop down. I did't think having 1 in that box would in itself cause you to not get an update. I've had mine set to 30 for a couple years and I still get quality updates. Bill
  9. @Maurice Naggar I'm a bit confused. As you will note in my attached screen print, the above did not move me to 592. That was installed before Christmas... long before this patch was available. It was the application of patch KB4528760 which I downloaded and installed from the link you provided which actually moved me to 592. This screen print shows what my Windows Update History shows. Bill Applying patch
  10. These two issues which were reported back in November are not fixed by the new beta 1.0.801. Since we don't get any details as to what is fixed in the beta, I am reporting these just in case they were supposed to have been fixed. Bill
  11. @Porthos I tried the stand alone installer on my wife's machine. It said she already had KB4528760 installed. So it must have already been in the 1903 update she installed yesterday morning. Again, thanks for all your help. Bill
  12. @Porthos First thing this morning I did another manual Windows update check on my PC and it still said I was up to date. So I downloaded the stand alone installer and installed KB4528760. Now doing a winver shows I am on 592. I guess I really don't understand why I was not being offered this update via Windows update since it had supposedly been available since Tuesday. Next I'll verify my wife's PC already has it installed by trying to run the stand alone installer. Thanks, Bill
  13. That is what I was wondering in reply #27. I am on 535 and KB4528760 is not installed on my computer and does not show in the quality updates anywhere. Despite that, the last 10 or 15 manual windows update checks continue to say I am up to date. This seems very strange to me since KB4528760 has apparently been available since Tuesday. Next I will try to update my machine using the stand alone installer from the link above. Thanks, Bill
  14. @Porthos I'm going to bed now. I'll try on her machine and mine tomorrow. Thanks for all your help (and your patience). Bill
  15. @Porthos Is it hidden in the update she did today to 1903 and therefore not showing under quality updates? Bill
  16. @Porthos Then how can my wife be on 592 but she doesn't have KB4528760 installed? See screenshot in reply #20. And here is her winver... Bill
  17. @Porthos I meant to ask a question in post #20 and failed to do so. Build 18382.592 does not imply that you have update KB4528760 installed... correct? That is how it appears to me. Thanks for the explanation on 1909. Bill
  18. @Porthos On a related note. Do you know why she would still be on 1903 while I got updated to 1909 back in December? Bill
  19. @Porthos OK... Just to clarify because I am still confused. What confused me is that she is on Build 18382.592 but she still doesn't have KB4528760 installed. So she needs to install it. It seemed like you were saying that to be on Build 18392.592 you first had to install KB4528760. Bill
  20. @Porthos Now I'm confused. My wife is on 1903, not 1909. Her build shows as 18362.592. However, she does not have KB4528760 installed. So 18362.592 does not mean that this fix is installed. Right? Bill
  21. @Maurice Naggar I ran manual updates at least 5 or 6 times yesterday and again 5 or 6 times today. Same thing... it says my system is up to date (and also my wife's). This despite the fact that we are obviously not up to date. If it continues like this tomorrow, I"ll download and install the update. Thanks for the link. Bill
  22. Here is what my update history shows. I am still showing up to date when I run Windows Update. My wife's laptop is also on Windows 10 1909 and she is also showing as up to date even though she doesn' t have Tuesday's updates. Bill
  23. Do you know if these updates are metered out? I'm on Win 10 1909 and Windows Update says I am up to date and this KB has not been installed on my system. Bill
  24. @tetonbob I just installed the 1.0.793 beta and it seems to have fixed the problem. I am now getting the correct Roboform UI when I close and reopen Google Chrome. I'll keep an eye on it and let you know if I experience any other issues with Roboform. Thanks, Bill
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.