Jump to content

DodiGlenn_PCMatic

Members
  • Posts

    3
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by DodiGlenn_PCMatic

  1. I appreciate that. I would rather MalwareBytes voluntarily test their products, rather than a competitor, to remove any confusion and assumptions about a commissioned test.
  2. The only reason I posted the link was to show that MalwareBytes is being tested by companies that were not commissioned by PC Pitstop. That's why I specifically called out MBAM 2.0, instead of making it sound like it was MBAM 3.0 being tested. I would love for MalwareBytes to participate in more tests, from various testing houses, such as AV-Test, Virus Bulletin, etc., however, that has not been seen recently. Dodi Glenn
  3. Since the test was commissioned by PC Pitstop, I thought it would be appropriate to chime in. As several have pointed out, this is just one test, and there will be many more to come. Our view is that customers should know how their AV products rate, and should look at multiple tests, not just one, to make that determination. We also feel that vendors should embrace third party testing, and use it as an additional arm of Quality Assurance, to help figure out where there may be defects in the product or in processes. There are other 3rd party tests, not commissioned by PC Pitstop, which show how MalwareBytes 2.0 performed. One such test was done by MRG Effitas, https://www.mrg-effitas.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/MRG-Effitas-360-Assessment-Q4-2016.pdf , called the MRG Effitas 360 Degree Assessment & Certification. Thanks, Dodi Glenn VP, Cyber Security
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.