Jump to content

Massimiliano

Techbench
  • Posts

    1,011
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Massimiliano

  1. I would like to know if analyzes are also being made to find malicious yet unknown threats or codes: a similar feature seems to be there for windows; if I'm not mistaken they call zero-day threats. At what point are you with protection during web browsing and scan with disc selection? thank you
  2. I would like to know, because it is not possible to understand it during the scan, how many are threats currently detected by MalwareBytes 3.0.3.403 for macOS and among these how many are the ramsomware known? thanks
  3. To protect Web browsing from Malwarebytes, in addition to Google Safe Browsing, it could be added to interact with both Safari and other browsers, a function for blocking content that can be activated by category at user discretion on a Web site categorization set-up screen. The last two are deactivated by default and must not be enabled (this is for greater security). Attached image of how it might be the set-up screen. Obviously, disabled categories are not allowed This feature has already been implemented by other security software and it's not original, and it would be interesting to even implement into MalwareBytes 3 Excuse me if the category are writed in Italian language and not in English
  4. During installation under high sierra malwarebytes needs to be approved by security and privacy settings. This is not about all applications because the installation of Microsoft Office does not generate this request. Can you solve it?
  5. Ultimately, alvarnell wants a slimmer product I prefer it slender but without losing it to safety I leave the malwarebytes staff to make the decisions by trying to make the users mac and internet browsing more secure by compromising the performance of the mac as little as possible
  6. Mac's unacceptable slowness I've never experienced with any antivirus I've tried (even with the bitdefender deep system scan) In windows I regularly use the pc while scanning harmful elements and even when doing the complete file system without any slowdown Aside from currently scanning the mac with malwarebytes lasts 10 seconds and not 3 minutes, I do not ask for a compulsory scan of the entire file system and a bit more thorough scan in general (such as scanning Windows bad elements that does not make every single file but it is a bit more in-depth than the current mac) but the chance to do it (each one then is free to choose the super fast scan or the slowest but most in-depth scan) summing I propose to leave the product with the functions it has (apart from still missing the Italian and other languages) in addition add a more thorough scan Add the ability to scan external disks and pendrive Additional Websites protection (add to Google SafeBrowsing) with the ability to block certain types of content (phishing, weapons, drugs, gambling, sex, pedophilia (this block should not be mandatory but by choice)) and ad -blocking during navigation also because where it can place unknown malware it does not know and in this way you can only have malwarebytes as a complete solution and do not have to install 15,000 different antivirus products
  7. I disagree with it Scanning to protect against any kind of malicious software is paramount. The selection of the area to be scanned also allows you to scan a disc drive or a pendrive. In-depth scanning as a possible choice, not mandatory, allows anyone who wants to protect the entire system; if alvarnell does not want to be totally protected is free to do so. Google SafeBrowsing is not omnipotent, a better security without breaking down its performance (windows does not have any performance crashes, I do not see why it should happen in macOS) is only positive. Equifax second blog.malwarebytes.com was also violated (https://blog.malwarebytes.com/101/2017/09/equifax-aftermath-how-to-protect-against-identity-theft/) Many times with scans searching for malicious software unknown, new issues have been discovered and this has allowed, without locking the machine, to save the data of multiple users. Who knew, for example, Not-Petya or Wannacry before the global epidemic exploded? Thank you regards
  8. equal to the Windows version no, protection not only against malware and more in-depth scanning with the selection of places to scan are desirable; I hope the sooner the web protection mentioned will arrive thank you regards
  9. When harmful websites protection, harmful elements scanning (so it's called in MS-Windows) with disk selection and deep system scan? thanks greetings
  10. A tip about Mac protection Protect from harmful websites and scanners harmful elements (so it's called in MS-Windows) with disk selection and for the moment it would be almost perfect for MacOS version. (Obviously protecting against malware, ransomware, viruses, pup, etc.)
  11. I have a macbook pro 2012 with ssd with filevault with macOS Sierra 10.12.6 I installed the malwarebytes 3.0 beta for mac and did not have any problems When the official release was released I uninstalled the beta and installed the official one and I had no problem When MalwareBytes notified the presence of an update I installed it on the previous version without making any uninstallation and even here no problem. In the last release the only thing missing is the version of definitions for the rest is all ok.
  12. IOS antivirus does not exist but some software houses develop protection apps from harmful web content and limitation of websites that are categorized by the user amongst the intended categories. For example, it is possible to block websites containing naked images, pedophilia, alcohol, drugs, weapons, phishing, gambling, and other similar malicious sites and even adblocks. It would not be bad if Malwarebytes produced such a app for iOS , but calmly: first optimize the version for macOS then well come iOS
  13. Protect from harmful websites and scanners harmful elements (so it's called in MS-Windows) with disk selection and for the moment it would be almost perfect for MacOS version. (Obviously protecting against malware, ransomware, viruses, pup, etc.)
  14. Anti-everything protection is not needed, but a full-fledged protection can be desirable even at the web level without worsening the performance of the mac. Apart from the fact that the Windows version does not slow down so much the pc, even less, in my opinion, would happen with the mac that is a much better performing machine
  15. Specifically I was referring to the transfer of data between my mac and my pc windows. Other topic: It would be interesting to implement protection from harmful web sites (not just phishing but all kinds of web threats) that should, like in windows, block the opening of the site with a web page with your logo, protection against threats Still unknown (as though I'm not mistaken already there in windows) and cover all kinds of existing threats in macOS (ramsomware, malware, exploits, etc.) and also the ability to do custom disk scans (not just the system disk But also an external pendrive or hdd (excluding time machine disks) with the ability to scan all the disk files (both in external and internal drives). Is it already possible to implement it in version 3.1 for high sierra? thank you regards
  16. However, in the case of data exchange between windows and macos, in this way, you may have to scan both systems and not just the system from which the data is moved.
  17. Satisfied for real-time protection on macOS, still unhappy for the few implemented features: when does the version for HighSierra with possibly more real-time protection features (other threats)? Thanks Greetings Massimiliano
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.