1. I am very technical, and my "false positive" claim is that you report "Trojan.Agent.CK' while it is NOT a trojan. If MWB wants to warn a user about a code that is benign to the system but belongs to a a class of software that is dangerous, then it should report it as a "Suspicious file" - as some other AV program do. 2. The major AV program declare the file as "clean". Some 2nd tier scanners report the file not as a trojan carrier but as "suspicious". None claim the file as carrying an active load of trojan code, and indeed the file, tested in a controlled environment, did not modify the registry, did not fork any extra process, did not set up a server, did not try to connect to the internet and did not inject itself to any system file, environment or process. 3. I occasionally serve as a computer "fixer" and "adviser" to family and friends, and try to analyze their system problems. I get to analyze suspicious emails, documents and files they suspect. I am certainly aware about the illegal and dangerous load that can be carried by cracks and I do advise them about the risk involved, but as I would notify an airport scanner vendor that his machine reported a box loaded with crack (no pun intended) as explosives - and I would expect him to fix his analysis, I would do the same in our case. 4. If MWB's file analysis philosophy would stay as stated, meaning reporting false positives solely due to association with "bad company", then this will happen: if MWB scan reports "all clean" , then I am OK; if it reports "trojans found" , then the verdict would be "maybe - lets scan the files with another scanner".