Jump to content

ThrashZone

Honorary Members
  • Posts

    23
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

0 Neutral

Recent Profile Visitors

763 profile views
  1. This is not the first nor will it be the last time a bad update turns a perfectly good computer into a large paperweight after a bad update lived in the wild for 3 hours possibly longer tagging .sys files as malware Should mbam alter it's default settings willingly to a realistic state, Auto Quarantining is ultimately dangerous as people find out eventually, Is reloading windows a acceptable circumstance when or if windows restore points fail ? I'm sure this will be moved to feedback so I'll leave it at that, Locking threads is a pitiful way to stifle feedback as a company you should do better at accepting peoples inquiries where ever they leave it, Word will get out that mbam is no longer a trustworthy "if it detects something remove it" utility Once that word gets out the same which was on the positive note and mbam got popular and people bought it/ mbam will fail, You have to cater to the non advanced user this is essentially why the default settings need to be changed willingly by mbam Leaving them as they are is not a benefit to your customer or potential customer or anyone recommending your product, Cheers.
  2. 3 hours is a long time we at SevenForums have seen 2 new questions about this goose egg life already, I'm quite sure they will not be the last, Possibly mbam should alter the default setting to reflect the danger of auto quarantine of detections ?
  3. I'd just like to know exactly how long was this goose egg of an update allowed to live ?
  4. Too bad your not revolving around the default settings One has to be aware mbam is not trustworthy before settings would be altered, If mbam is not trustworthy then it would not be used
  5. This is a jewel, I stopped using scheduled scanning when 2.0 ..... was loaded, I wonder why ? Lost faith in mbam I'm going to Stop recommending mbam Use that in your cluster buddy.
  6. That's pretty interesting, MSE updates come to users via the windows update system, So this is pretty wacky, I personally do not load Optional windows updates automatically too much other junk come via the same category so this is not testable but the entries I have excluded in mbam for MSE are these I have a 64 bit machine so MSE is in both program files and x86 program files as Microsoft security client, Being a Windows update is being blocked I would know what to exclude Manually updating MSE and loading the Optional updates are not being blocked on my end "Yet" Good topic though, Cheers.
  7. Can't blame you there wanting the 1.75... version back, I'd be getting it there too if not for my 2 year extended download contract Don't forget to fully get rid of the 2.0.... version, Then you will most likely have to change the program update setting to or it will update to 2.0.... again, https://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=148827
  8. Didn't direct the main foggy point though ? Should of just deleted the thread, Otherwise it's a no brainer why the new gui change, Touch interface, My wish is that someday a developer will be able to tell the difference between a machine with touch capabilities and one that does not That day may never come sadly, But be one of the first companies that does
  9. Me too although as a paid customer I wouldn't expect them there to begin with, What's with that ? A pro/ premium or whatever you want to call it should be exempt to these unnecessary messages/ adds, A scanner should update and scan and that's it. Anything else is for the most part a wasted desperate function which should be only on the Free version, take up their precious resources instead of paid customers that have basically made or promoted mabm for years via paying for your product and recommending it on every forum they participate on like Answers.microsoft.com/ TechNet.com/ Sevenforums.com/.... Without us would you be where you are today ? I doubt it.
  10. Yes the UI is predictable win-8 touch screen/ pad rubbish I do wish just once programs would recognize when touch interface is not available and those resources are also a wasted on it, My issue is I have allot of graphics programs that take up every resource so all is precious, So scheduling something is not predictable, Besides these little article links are really for the most part unnecessary rubbish that should be exclusive to the free products, Most people would minimize the scanner anyway so what real purpose do they serve, If it's another money maker... paid advertisements for mabm again they should be thrown at the free version users Only. Where they will for the most part be ignored and minimized, Cheers. mabm wants feedback well all they have to do is read it I guess ? little of everything here.
  11. Well the marketing ploy came directly from mabm as an option, I do not download anything except from the developers site, I really didn't have an issue with supporting mabm still don't but this rollout has been less than ideal = I'm on hold = one of the holdouts awaiting a real stable version and upgrading process, Which did fail in my case/ activation issue, Used mabm clean....... to get back to 1.75... Still though I do not like 2.0.... the adds or links to articles are Unnecessary and should be removed from the scanner display, If mabm what's to shows these items leave them on the free version but premium/ pro upgraders should not see them even for a second, Even these little links take up resources which a scanner should do nothing else but update and scan on command or schedule, With real time protection scheduled scanning is redundant and can be narrowed to every couple of weeks or monthly for that matter the task is not brain surgery It's what I've always done I'm the only one who knows when a scan is necessary and I do not use my machine while it runs so time wise is also my picking, All scanners work best when the machine is not in use and I don't leave it running all night so sleep is disabled there is no need to wake anything, Cheers.
  12. Sense you don't work for mabm your opinion really is not what I'm interested in as far as the extended download goes, It activates the products I bought, And yes I wouldn't say Pro unless it was Pro licenses I was referring to and owned, If definitions are updated as usual then it's all good, But if unchecking program updates effects definition updates that's bad and unacceptable, If definitions are not automatically updated for 1.75... then we have any other conflict in pro vs free version not that there is a 1.75.. free version but as far as pro 1.75.. there's a big difference, Yes I found those settings yesterday morning when the popup upgrade nags began, I do not use scheduled scanning, Cheers.
  13. MABM has turned 1.75... into nagware, 2.0what ever has had a poor upgrade for 1.75...Pro users in 2.0...short lifespan, Turning 1.75.. into Nagware is not only an insult to that injury it makes No practical sense for a business to do to customers that made mabm where it is today or at least where it was a month in a half or so ago = Popular and flawless, Does this leave another bad taste = Yes A very poor new business model IMHO, I have 3 pro licenses and two 2 year extended download contracts for version 1.75... that don't expire until 11/13/14, Which mabm is about to be Breach. Where is the Refund line ?
  14. I agree mabm has turned 1.75... into nagware, 2.0what ever has had a poor upgrade for 1.75...Pro users in 2.0...short lifespan, Turning 1.75.. into Nagware is not only an insult to that injury it makes No practical sense for a business to do to customers that made mabm where it is today or at least where it was a month in a half or so ago = Popular and flawless, Does this leave another bad taste = Yes A very poor new business model IMHO, I have 3 pro licenses and two 2 year extended download contracts for version 1.75... that don't expire until 11/13/14, Which mabm is about to be Breach. Where is the Refund line ?
  15. SCRIPT1010: Expected identifier index.php, line 1 character 9 SEC7111: HTTPS security is compromised by http://images.cdn.static.malwarebytes.org/forum_resources/staff.png index.php SEC7111: HTTPS security is compromised by https://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?showtopic=147605&page=2 index.php
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.