Jump to content

Francois_Blais

Honorary Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    289

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Francois_Blais

  1. Francois_Blais
    Had myself that problem. Just reinstalled with the given link, and version is now 4.5.34.275, thanks. (was stuck at 4.5.33) Thanks...
  2. Francois_Blais
    Thanks. My second computer, which got the update yesterday, is also in Canada. Finally downloaded the setup file, since the first computer didn't get auto-updated yet. Regards, François
  3. Francois_Blais
    Hi. One of my two computers got build 303 by auto-update, but not the other. Tried to download it here, but only the build 288 is available. Thanks!
  4. Francois_Blais
    1.13.1.235? This build has not been announced here yet. Maybe they forgot?
  5. Francois_Blais
    Got build 141 automatically today, but I see no announcement nor manual download link. ???
  6. Francois_Blais
    Ok, thanks! I thought it was lower with the previous component package. Best, François
  7. Francois_Blais
    Hi. Updated manually to the new component package. Rebooted twice since then, and memory consumption seems abnormal and maybe related to a conflit with MSE? Running W7 Pro x64 fully updated with MBAM premium and MSE only. Svchost is also high, maybe related to the conflict? MSE and MBAM are fully excluded from each other, by the way. Screenshot show the three most memory consuming apps running at the moment. Thnks!
  8. Francois_Blais
    Do you run the very latest beta? (3.1.1) Did you excluded other security programs, if any? I have no more performance issues at all with this one.
  9. Francois_Blais
    Isn't Thunderbird already included?
  10. Francois_Blais
    +1!
  11. Francois_Blais
    Thanks! I'll look at this AVG ZEN thing... Best! François
  12. Francois_Blais
    Thanks to you! Glad Malwarebytes finally have what seems to be a winner! You didn't notice anything worth fixing in my machine, with the logs I provided? Thanks again! François
  13. Francois_Blais
    Good morning Ron. I installed the new beta, rebooted and compiled with and without self-protection. (the others were enabled) Congrats! The time was the same, i.e. short! Good work! Best, François
  14. Francois_Blais
    Bingo! It's the self-protection module that causes the slowdown, even with the other four protections disabled! I'm attaching the requested files, but I can't include mbamservice.log in the logs because 7-zip complains it's open into another program. (makes sense) Had to disable self-protection to be able to make a zipfile of the other logs. Addition.txt FRST.txt MB-CheckResult.txt logs.zip
  15. Francois_Blais
    Oh, thanks, missed that one, sorry! I'll check again in a few days and let you know. However, for some reason, MBAM disappeared from the tray a couple of days ago. The service is running but not the tray app. Strange.
  16. Francois_Blais
    Hi Devin. Please read posts #11 and #17 in this thread, to answer your second question.
  17. Francois_Blais
    I stand corrected, Devin, thanks!
  18. Francois_Blais
    You'll probably hear from officials here soon, but Malwarebytes suffered from a similar problem a while ago, and they are supposed to have installed everything needed to prevent this from happening again. But as I said, I'm not an official, just a follower.
  19. Francois_Blais
    Thanks Ron. It's a Dell computer with a Broadcom netlink gigabit network adapter. FWIW, I was able to find a newer driver but the compile time went from 3.5 seconds to 4.5, so hardly a success. I had rebooted after installation of the new driver. I'm still puzzled about the throughput beeing the same whether the protection is enabled or disabled though, but can live with slower compile times, since I'm not compiling 8 hours a day... Best regards, François
  20. Francois_Blais
    Of course, but add this to all the other problems since the launch of MBAM 3 and it doesn't help to give a good feeling about the product. This version should not have been publicly released so fast. I hope Malwarebytes won't repeat the same mistakes with version 4.
  21. Francois_Blais
    I second that idea, but how did previous releases behave, can't remember.
  22. Francois_Blais
    Wow, I'm speechless...
  23. Francois_Blais
    Ok, so here's some thought food. I did graphs with Windows performance monitor. (CPU, memory and disk usage) Network compile is about 2.3 times slower than local compile. Disabling all the protections doesn't change anything, profiles are almost exactly the same. (very strange...) Deactivating the license makes the compile very fast, even across the network. Note: all compile target directories were in the exclusions My first impression is that disk I/O speed makes the biggest impact. Network access is slow when MBAM is real-time, even if all protections have been turned off (web, malware, anti-exploit and ransomware), which is really strange. LOCAL COMPILE: NETWORK COMPILE with everything activated: NETWORK COMPILE with everything turned OFF: NETWORK COMPILE in FREE mode:
  24. Francois_Blais
    Thanks, I'll check with resmon tomorrow. Do you know a way to get more than 60 seconds of scrollback?
  25. Francois_Blais
    Yes, I have run the lodctr commands last week. For the moment, all I can say is that the whole compilation process takes several times longer than without MBAM. I'll try to see if I can come up with something more specific. Do you have some in-house supervisor software which can watch MBAM and generate some logfile? Or special command-line options to launch MBAM to get logfiles? Regards, François
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.