Jump to content

smipx013

Members
  • Content Count

    83
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About smipx013

  • Rank
    Regular Member

Recent Profile Visitors

964 profile views
  1. The details in MBAM are a little light on detail so its difficult for me to make a good conclusion. In Virustotal it was clean according to their Malwarebytes scan and clean for all other scans apart from CRDF which marked it as Malicious.
  2. ps. I know I can add it as an exclusion but I just wanted to know if it really is dodgy or not. I use this program almost daily too so its an extra big worry for me. If the site / program is a problem then I will start the hunt for a good alternative.
  3. Hi all, Not sure if this is the right way to report this but I was a bit shocked today to go to roadkil.net website (the creator of the excellent Unstoppable Copier program) and was stopped in my tracks due to "Trojan" #1 this is really worrying if it really is a trojan infected site and/or unstoppable copier contains a trojan - this piece of software is very widely used by technicians (like myself) to recover data for customers #2 The chap behind this website does a really good job of providing "donation ware" and its a shame for him. Can anyone offer any insight? Thanks Paul
  4. That's a real shame. You would have thought it would have been given a slightly higher priority - paying customers have been patiently waiting and its a poor show.
  5. Hi, Can you let us know which release will have the fix and when it will be released. I have been running my MBAM without ransomware protection since (it seems forever) waiting for this to be resolved. I am not checking the forums every day as I have a life outside of Malwarebytes and Kaspersky so was to diarise when I can put the Ransomware back on. Thanks Paul
  6. That's all useful stuff. Thanks exile360. My comments were borne out of frustration rather than any criticism of Malwarebytes 🙂 Here's hoping things get sorted. Cheers, Paul
  7. Hi, Kaspersky will not fix their product. they are quite clear. they say ....... "we don't support Kaspersky with Malwarebytes - you must disable the realtime protection of malwarebytes or remove Malwarebytes". They have (via their forums) indicated that they will not be "fixing" anything as nothing is broken in their eyes. So here we are again.... Faced with three choices in reality 1. Revert to the "Free" Malwarebytes as recommended by Kaspersky - keep Kaspersky (a.k.a. Ditch Malwarebytes) 2. Disable Ransomware in MBAM and wait until the next thing breaks between the two and then disable that also and so on and so on 3. Ditch Kaspersky and find an Antivirus that plays nice with Malwarebytes. Most people with Kaspersky "Free" or "Paid" are with them because it is a very good antivirus, independently evaluated and ranked alongside other Antivirus products (so an informed choice based on peer review), it is very light on resources (unlike Bitdefender and Avast and AVG) does not bomabard you with adverts too much (unlike Avast) so these users are going to be very reluctant to ditch Kaspersky and these users will simply not use Malwarebytes on its own (or with only Windows Defender). The only proper solution here is for Malwarebytes to modify its product to make it work with Kaspersky as all the other solutions are either never going to happen or are not at all desirable. If it comes to a no choice scenario then I will have to reluctantly uninstall Malwarebytes Pro. I don't want to but I am kind of being forced to if Malwarebytes are unable to adjust the product to work with all the major AV vendors as they always promised to do. Paul
  8. I agree with this philosophy but....... The settings does not seem to have the exclusions any more. Exclusions is an "advanced" feature in this respect and the need to go into "Detection History" is totally counter intuitive. I have not had a detection in my history so why would I want to go there to add an exclusion for a folder I want to always exclude when I setup the program. Fair enough if one has had a detection and then wants to select it and exclude it in the future but makes no sense for the people who want to set up mutual exclusions for example (with their AV) prior to enabling MBAM. Lets face it - most people who choose to use an antivirus alongside MBAM will need to do this and the last place thay will think to look is under "Detection History". Paul
  9. Hi there. Well the iptest website is being blocked as intended but I am getting these top 10 websites that I thought Malwarebytes blocked from your own Threat Centre. Its probably a mis-understanding on my part but should not all of the websites in the https://blog.malwarebytes.com/detection/domain/ list also be blocked? Like I say - probably my mis-understanding. Thanks Paul
  10. Hi, I was reading another thread : And.. I was interested in the sites listed at the Malwarebytes Threat Center to see if my new shiny V4 Malwarebytes was doing its stuff. I went to each of the top10 blocked sites and none of them were blocked at all. FYI I am using the latest Chrome build with uBlock Origin and the Bitdefender Trafficlight (neither of these blocked them either): I don't have Kaspersky installed at the moment (I removed it due to the issues with the Kaspersky Patch (e) so wanted to start a brand new thread. I do have Bitdefender Free Installed (with all the appropriate mutual exclusions added to Malwarebytes and Bitdefender). I also disabled Bitdefender to see if that was having an effect but the sites all still loaded just fine. I then disabled uBlock Origin in Chrome to be sure and I could still get to them all (most of them anyway - some were not reachable). Have I mis-understood something or is something bot working right for me? Thanks Paul
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.