Jump to content

blackdove83

Honorary Members
  • Posts

    155
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by blackdove83

  1. Maybe some anti malware you use broke it since its basically a PUP?
  2. I have four lifetime licenses currently and i dont like subscriptions, however $25 a year for three computers is dirt cheap for as big a part of an antimalware solution as Malwarebytes is. While the OP didnt state it well i tend to agree with liking to only purchase what i actually need. Right now mbam pro for $25 for three computers is a good deal. That being said there were a ton of people trying to get lifetime licenses because a lot of people prefer to own rather than lease. I am one of them. If malwarebytes anti exploit is an additional cost eventually that is applied to the subscription then the additional costs for unused licenses will probably turn people off to make additional purchases. A standard price for a single license with a bulk discount would be a lot more attractive and a better value for people who need two or four licenses.
  3. https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/7e500cb16095951133a5e62f7a0e9fda497f447b30868b6437a2a7de2f3307d7/analysis/1398388823/ Looks like only bitdefender flags the site as malicious.
  4. Does my real pro mbam detect the fake?
  5. https://www.virustotal.com/en/ip-address/72.21.81.253/information/ Is this normal? mbam.exe does it on multiple computers.
  6. http://m.youtube.com/results?q=nvidia&sm=12 They dont have to waste time. Technology like that and multi billion dollar 60MW datacenters make it all automated.
  7. Ok thanks. I couldnt replicate it and the .pdf i think caused it was from Lexus official site.
  8. Not intentionally. I'm asking you what it really means if I'm misinterpreting what I'm reading. I'm interpreting it as "a bunch of malware communicates with that IP for some reason." I am asking what it means.
  9. "Latest detected files that communicate with this IP address Latest files submitted to VirusTotal that are detected by one or more antivirus solutions and communicate with the IP address provided when executed in a sandboxed environment." Then theres a ton of known malware listed that communicates with that IP when executed? What does it actually mean, if I'm misinterpreting the data?
  10. Ok that explains what it is but why does so much malware phone home to its IP?
  11. Just hadnt updated it on that PC. I will today. Just to clarify it was a normal error in mbae and and not something malicious that crashed it?
  12. Is it a service the mbam forum uses to host the avatars? I was shocked by the VT results.
  13. When I was browsing the forum, I noticed that a connection on port 443 was initiated and a few bytes sent to this address: https://www.virustotal.com/en/ip-address/192.0.80.239/information/ It only does it when I'm on Malwarebytes' forum... Does anyone else get this as well? I'm using TCPView to monitor activity on my network. The IP looked strange so I VirusTotaled it and that's what I got.
  14. On one of the PC's I use, I have MBAE 0.9.5.1000 and EMET 4.1 running alongside MBAM Pro 2.0 and MSE. Tonight I got this while browsing Lexus's website. Program: C:\Program Files\Malwarebytes Anti-Exploit\mbae.exe File: f:\dd\vctools\crt_bld\self_64_amd64\crt\src\dbgdel.cpp Line: 52 Expression: _BLOCK_TYPE_IS_VALID(pHead->nBlockUse) For information on how your program can cause an assertion failure, see the Visual C++ documentation on asserts (Press Retry to debug the application) I pressed Retry and literally nothing happened, and mbae seemed to close. My CPU was being used at about 30% for apparently nothing for a while after I hit debug, then returned to normal. Any idea what would have caused this error?
  15. Kind of mysterious to me still. Perhaps the power button itself is mechanically broken and intermittently sends a shutdown signal? The header to the switch on the motherboard? Could be a small hardware failure like that i guess. I would personally re run malwarebytes antirootkit and get the latest malicious software removal tool from www.microsoft.com and run a quick scan.
  16. Have you checked to see if your router is compromised? DNS?
  17. One of those ransomewares actually kept the decryption key on the HDD of the infected PC but i think they patched that since it was discovered recently. You should definitely secure your PC and make sure its clean and trustable as well.
  18. Anti exploits like Malwarebytes anti exploit(or anti exploits that work better than EMET 4.1) are necessary now since a lot of attacks rely on exploits to drop malware. Its a layer your setup doesnt have since MSE and mbam dont have exploit mitigation but it is absolutely necessary. Keeping flash and java updated(if you need them)with exploit mitigation for both is also a must. Internet explorer 11 with protected mode, malwarebytes anti exploit and EMET on max security with deep hooks is probably a safe enough combination. As for speed, as long as you have a decent cpu and ram, your internet connection would affect your speed a lot more than your browser i would think. If youre on an underpowered computer with very little ram your choice in browser might affect performance to a degree you could notice.
  19. Ive done some googling and reading and i was wondering if having these services running is potentially detrimental and if theyre even necessary. All of the answers and info i have found is very vague so far. The lms.exe was using about 25% cpu on a friends computer. As he lives far away i cant personally inspect it. Was also wondering if any of these virtualization features are known to be used as part of a hypervisor malware package or if they could be.
  20. Id really like to have an option similar to EMET where i can select from a few different color schemes. I like the Steam default skin and have EMET dark to match. A similar gray with white text would be nice. Maybe even a windows style customizer would be good. That being said i dont care what it looks like as much as i care about protection.
  21. I have both windows 7 an 8 and ive always hated 8. The modern interface is not intuitive or ergonomic. The real start menu coming back, and never needing to go into that stupid modern screen will be a way to make windows 8 more like 7.
Back to top
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.