milanr66

Your Anti-Rootkit considers the file to "Unknown.Rootkit.Driver" but it is driver for my NVIDIA video card. It will not work without it.

I think we've finally come to a correct and legitimate position. I hope that the administrators consider this a fruitful and fair discussion useful. Thanks to all who have devoted time and attention to this debate.

Let's be clear here. You say: "If you do not have pirated software, we will help you, but if you have pirated software, then we will not help." Consider the second sentence: "If you're not a pedophile, then we'll bend the wound, and if you pedophile, then we will not bend the wound." What is difference? But let's look at the following sentence: "If you need help, I'll help you." This is the only position that is not discrimination.

My dear friend. If someone does not get to drink water in your house, because he had pirated software on his computer - no doubt, that is discrimination. There is no difference between this one came for water or medical assistance or help with viruses. If the screening is done on the basis of belonging to any group, it is discrimination. For example, the drug is prohibited by law. Even her possession. Addict has severe dark circles. You refuse to give him water to drink, because you recognize that he is a drug addict - that's discrimination.

Ok, I see. If you insist... Rather than advertise "here is no discrimination, there is no discrimination," as it would be to exchange some arguments? First, what is discrimination? "Discrimination is the prejudicial and/or distinguishing treatment of an individual based on their actual or perceived membership in a certain group or category, "in a way that is worse than the way people are usually treated"." So this forum activity is related to the virus. This is a such as a shop. I come to shop and wear on my lapel bedž that says "I am a pirate." The saleswoman is ready to serve me but then, suddenly, see the badge on my lapel. "I'm sorry sir, we're not serve people who wear the badge and who are members of that group," said a seller. So the work of the company, other than the core business, there is a supplement. The supplement is called "politics." Suddenly, the company activity against viruses, joins the fight against piracy. It seems on the basis of their individual decisions and not based on any law. You have introduced a moral sanction against someone who has pirated software. The sanctions lead to different treatment of people of your choice, not by law. Are we absolutely sure that this is not discrimination?

I sincerely thank you for your advice in good faith.

First of all, thank you for answering. 1) You closed my second conversation in which I am not ask for any assistance, but as a general communication with the engineer. Your quote about piracy only mentions the case of assistance. I'm not the engineer asked for any assistance. It would be as if you now close this conversation. 2) To remove traces of pirated software on this computer, obviously I had to format my drive. It is a huge operation. I can not do it in this moment. So I do not expect help. However, I expect to be able to talk about viruses on this forum and I expect that no one chasing me. Finally, I do not even know what it exactly means to be a pirate. I'm not a pirate. But what's done is done.

A few days ago I spoke to this forum in two places 1) I have identified one rare and a new virus and I notified the engineers about it 2) I asked for help to remove the virus concerned. During the exchange of logs, one of the administrators noticed that on my computer there are some pirated software. He informed me of the policy of this forum to piracy and turned off my theme. The administrator explained that those who have pirated software on their computers, will get no help from this forum. Ok. I continued my conversation with engineers online, not for help for me, understanding that providing additional information about the behavior of the virus, help forums, companies and the entire community of computer users. However, the same administrator appeared on the subject, informed me that the forum "does not endorse" piracy. In this regard: 1) I'm not a criminal. If I am, please let someone prosecuted in legal proceedings, and if not, please do not treat me like I'm a criminal. 2) This forum, as I understand it, is not a private club, but this is a public forum. If the public, and any sanction distinction between members on the basis of "policy" that is not the law, is discrimination. Please, do not discriminate. I'm human just like you and I have my human rights. 3) I understand that this organization is fighting the viruses, not fighting piracy. Now, if you refuse to help someone because "pirate" it is as if a doctor refuses to treat someone because it is ideologically different. It is also discrimination. Please,that certain unnamed administrator to review his attitudes and use his "policy" so as not to come into a state of exaggeration. Finally, I bought this computer used, not sure what all of the programs it has. You know, some people do not have money to buy a new computer. Some people have to buy the used computer. Thank you for your attention.

Here are the last three files that you asked me to. ESET_TEST_24_JUNE_2013.txtJRT.txtAdwCleanerS1.txt I expect your next instructions. In the meantime, I had blocked the activity of the virus so I deleted a file iswizard.7z and made a folder of the same name, which is empty. It seems that the system does not allow the virus to overwrite the folder. Thank you!

OK, this is first two logs. I will continue to do what you've said, and as soon as it's done the rest, I will sendmbam-log-2013-06-24 (12-30-46).txtmbam-log-2013-06-24 (12-15-13).txt

Hello! I have problem with file iswizard.7z. It. He continues to come back when you physically delete it. Located in LocalSettings / Temp. It moves the file dwm.exe, which is a heavy burden the CPU. Please help.