Pierre (aka Terdef)

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Pierre (aka Terdef)

  • Rank
    New Member
  • Birthday

Contact Methods

  • ICQ

Recent Profile Visitors

2,030 profile views
  1. Hello, Assiste (Assiste.com) and the Forum are in mourning. nickW, Malwarebytes Expert, left us on Sunday, January 29th, in the morning. She had been fighting for years against the foul beast (cancer). She was a friend before being the chief moderator of our forums and probably the best assistant in the world when we practiced decontamination (we have definitely turned to prevention for a few years). nickW had countless activities and skills and was involved at a high level on countless websites and forums. She brought here punctilious corrections to the French translation. She was, inter alia, an interpreter French/English/French, and defendant of the French language. I am particularly affected by this disappearance. Countless assistants (helpers) have known her for years, even without realizing it, with all her editorials and official translations, sometimes under copyright, of countless softwares and tools, sites and services. She was one of the pillars on which security was built. It is possible to leave a small word of memory in this thread to never forget and honor her: http://assiste.forum.free.fr/viewtopic.php?f=35&t=31557 Pierre Founder and administrator of http://assiste.com
  2. Bonjour, Le blocage par IP pose évidemment un problème avec les serveurs mutualisés. C'est le cas de free.fr, en France, qui est une sorte de "poil à gratter" de l'Internet et du Web. C'est, entre autre, un énorme FAI, qui permet à ses clients d'héberger gratuitement un ou des sites sur des serveurs dédiés aux "pages personnelles". On estime qu'il y a plus de 100.000 sites web sur ces serveurs. Les miens ont été un temps sur ces serveurs et certains y sont encore. Bloquer une grappe par son IP revient à bloquer des milliers de sites chez tous les utilisateurs de MBAM. http://hosts-file.net/?s= Cordialement Hello, The IP blocking obviously poses a problem with shared servers. This is the case with free.fr, in France, which is a kind with "itching powder" of the Internet and the Web. It is, among other things, a huge ISP, which allows its customers to freely host large websites (100 GO) on servers reserved for the "personal pages". It is estimated that there are over 100,000 websites on these servers. Mine were a time on these servers and some are still there. Block a cluster by IP amounts to block thousands websites for all MBAM users. http://hosts-file.net/?s= Regards
  3. Hi, Windows 10 Updates have been made? The BSOD occurs while there just had updates of MBAM, Bitdefender and Windows 10, so we can't say, in the facts, where does the problem comes from. Regards
  4. I know the code is the same for free and registered. But the result is there. Saying that the free version, that works on demand, is incompatible with Kaspersky products, is at the same level as saying that Windows Explorer is incompatible with Kaspersky products! An assistant (helper) responds to my tutorial, believing, without thinking, the things announced by GSI. I am enraged against this level of stupidity of some helpers who believe all and anything. And I wonder if GSI is not to be classified in the scarewares class. This problem did not start yesterday, ie : http://forum.kaspersky.com/lofiversion/index.php/t132492.html (in 2009) In https://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?/topic/107367-malwarebytes-compatibility-kaspersky-pure/?p=535318, please add this link : https://www.malwarebytes.org/pdf/reviews/AVTestingReport.pdf This is when a code is "accessed" with an attempt to execute/run in memory, The term "on-execution" is less known that "on-access". The classic "on-access" mutual exclusion does not exist and MBAM Premium can run alongside any other application "on-access" or "on-execution" (or "on-demand"). A malicious code in a file does not hurt anyone. It sleeps until it is requested for execution. If it is asked to open with notepad or notepad ++, etc. ... nobody risk anything. I'm an evangelist of Kaspersky and MBAM Premium. I use them simultaneously without any problem. Kaspersky attitude with GSI, and especially the message he passed to the assistants (helpers) (since GSI is requested by the assistants to the assistants), not fully informed, irritates me. Cordially ____________________ ps :: is there a limited number of images in a post ?
  5. Hi, What is this story of incompatibility with MBAM that tell us Get System Info (GFI) from Kaspersky, a free tool to test a machine against every software incompatible with Kaspersky tools ? I thought MBAM Premium (real time - On-access), compatible with all antivirus solutions. And, in my case, I have been roundly heckled about my tutorial on how to insert MBAM free (an "on-demand" task) in the sheduler in presence of kaspersky tools. The free MBAM works only "on-demand"! It makes no request for exclusive access to the files (as "on-access" tools do). MBAM free is compatible with everything, all the time. Get System Information (GFI) find that all world security features are incompatible with Kaspersky products. His message is clear: "Throw out all, that I put myself." It's only bullying. It's a lie! Is there anything I should know? Cordially ______________________________________________________________________________________________ My tutorial (In French) - Copyleft Comment lancer une analyse antimalwares automatique, avec la version gratuite de Malwarebytes Anti-Malware (MBAM), au démarrage de Windows, cette fonction n'étant normalement prévue que dans la version PRO (Premium) de MBAM. Pour décontaminer un ordinateur (malveillances réelles et / ou trucs indésirables ou simplement superflus - hors virus), on utilise divers outils (gratuits ou en version gratuite pour les produits commerciaux). Aucun de ces outils (en version gratuite pour ceux ayant une version commerciale et une version gratuite) ne travaille en temps réel (On-access) mais uniquement à la demande (On-Demand). Si vous voulez que l'un d'entre eux soit lancé automatiquement au démarrage de Windows, pour faire une analyse rapide du système, ce sera MBAM (Malwarebytes Anti Malware), sans l'ombre d'un doute. Toutefois, pour lancer la version gratuite de MBAM (Malwarebytes Anti Malware) automatiquement au démarrage de Windows, il faut faire un petit réglage dans les « tâches planifiées » (dans le « planificateur de tâches ») car cela n'est pas prévu de base. La version la plus à jour de la procédure suivante se trouve toujours ici Procédure : Clic sur le « Bouton Démarrer de Windows »Dans la boîte de recherche, saisir taskschd.mscClic sur taskschd.msc (ouverture du planificateur de tâches) Dans le volet de droite, clic sur « Créer une tâche de base... » Dans la fenêtre de l'assistant de création d'une tâche qui vient de s'ouvrir, donner un nom à votre convenance à la tâche planifiée. Par exemple : Analyse MBAM au démarrage de WindowsAjoutez, éventuellement, un commentaire (ou laissez vide)Clic sur le bouton Suivant Dans la fenêtre de sélection de l'évènement déclancheur, sélectionnez « Au démarrage de l’ordinateur »Clic sur le bouton Suivant Dans la fenêtre de type d'action à effectuer, sélectionnez « Démarrer un programme »Clic sur le bouton Suivant Dans la fenêtre de sélection du programme à lancer, clic sur le bouton Parcourir Localisez l'emplacement de votre installation de MBAM (Malwarebytes Anti Malware). Là, sélectionnez mbam.exeClic sur le bouton Ouvrir Dans le champ « Ajouter des arguments (facultatif) : », saisissez (recopiez), tel quel, espaces compris /scan -quick -terminateClic sur le bouton Suivant Clic sur le bouton Terminer A partir de maintenant, chaque fois que l'ordinateur sous Windows démarrera, MBAM (Malwarebytes Anti Malware), effectura : Une analyse (le switch « /scan »)L'analyse sera de type rapide (le switch « /quick »)Le switch « –terminate » ordonne à MBAM de se fermer après une analyse si aucune menace n’a été trouvée. Si quelque chose que MBAM pense malveillant est trouvé, l'interface MBAM reste ouvert pour vous laisser choisir le sort à réserver à la chose.
  6. Hi Marcin, MBAM makes good choices, as usual. There is a certain timidity of decontamination business solutions about PUPs, Adwares, and so on... I remember https://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?/topic/110784-false-positive-case-very-urgent/ or what Microsoft done, dealing with advocates, under the pretext of contract accepted by the end users, even if without their knowledge, after the acquisition of Giant AntiSpyware (December 16, 2004), an antispyware promised a bright future, killed by Microsoft. May the choice of MBAM cause a noticeable brake on the practices of bundlewares, trapped downloaders, repack and sponsoring without the knowledge of the user, or without his informed consent. May the choice of MBAM cause a noticeable brake on the forced promotion of poor softwares or totally useless, that have no other options to be sold that catching victims while raping their computers. May the choice of MBAM put a considerable brake on the flowering of pseudo solutions, unnecessary, dangerous, proceeding on fear (scareware), or purely for extortion. Thanks a lot for all.
  7. Hi, I spoke a little about that around me. I'm speechless. The notions of Opt-In and Opt-Out seem forgotten or ignored! This is something so old that it seems granted, and that we no longer discuss about it. Need we recall that we are all under the authority of the Opt-Out that governs us? All works, from Do Not Track (DNT) of the Mozilla Foundation, to tools like Unchecky or PC Decrapifier, are developed, with little success, because of the regime of the Opt-Out under which we are. Tons of struggles against Pups - Potentially Unwanted Program, daily, are developed because of the regime of the Opt-Out under which we are. All tools such as: MBAMAdwCleanerJunkware Removal Tool (JRT)ZHPCleanerEtc. ...are developed, in large part, because of the regime of the Opt-Out under which we are. The Toolbars settled because of the regime of the Opt-Out under which we are. How many times assistants (helpers), on decontamination forums, recommend an application to someone saying "Paid attention, when installing, to surely uncheck the box xxx, otherwise, the application yyy will settle down with. " "Unchecking the boxes", when not hidden or nonexistent, or with a misleading meaning, is making an Opt-Out we are forced to. But who understands what means these pre checked boxes and dishonesty deliveries or options so warmly recommended. Nobody reads the contracts nor look at anything around the "Download" button or the "Install" button. We are under the Opt-Out regime for so long, that we no more pay attention to the repacking, the sponsoring, etc. ... This has become something normal. This decision by the French Council of State is sovereign and founded a jurisprudence that is not open to interpretation in one sense by a judge, in another sense by another judge. The company referred to in that decision, tuto4pc.com, plans to climb to the European Court, which took protective positions of Internet users, recently, facing Google. I think something important has just happened. Cordially
  8. Hi, Something important has just happened in France. The Council of State, the highest administrative court, has decided to the obligation of the Opt-In. This is still frowned upon in its consequences as we see, for many, a simple slowing bundle, repack, etc. ... This happened in the context of a dispute between an advertising agency and the CNIL (National Commission for Computing and freedoms) An analysis in French: Le Conseil d’État se prononce pour l'Opt-in contre l'Opt-out Sincerely