Jump to content


Honorary Members
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About siliconman01

  • Rank
    True Member

Recent Profile Visitors

4,823 profile views
  1. Any luck on contacting Bitdefender technicians to fix this issue? I'm getting no response from them on this.
  2. Hey thanks! Hopefully you will be successful working with Bitdefender to resolve this issue. In the meantime, I will disable Advanced Threat Defense during a MBAM 4 scan.
  3. I have Bitdefender Internet Security 2020 installed on my primary computer. This is with Windows 10x64 Pro Build 18362.327 V1903. Even though I have placed IG.exe in the Exceptions area of Bitdefender's Advanced Threat Detection and Antivirus Protection sections, when I run a standard MB 4.0.1 scan or custom scan, Bitdefender jumps in and blocks IG.exe from doing something to a folder named IGDUMP located in LocalLow. I submitted IG.exe to Bitdefender as a FP last Thursday; however, there has been no corrective action via Bitdefender tech support. My questions are: 1. What is the impact of BD blocking IG.exe during a MB scan? 2. And the obvious question of "Does anyone know how to make BD 2020 to stop detecting this as a threat?"
  4. The 4.0 GUI does respond to my Lynktec pen when used on my primary PC with a Dell P2714T touch screen monitor. So MBAM 4 does have the ability to recognize the use of pens. I guess the fact that the Dell XPS 15 (9575) 2in1 functions as a Laptop or a Tablet is a bit confusing to MBAM 4. 🤔
  5. This applies to MB 4.01.31 on Windows 10x64 Pro Build 18362.295 V1903 running on a Dell XPS 15 (9575) 2in1 laptop/tablet. The new GUI responds to the keyboard touch pad cursor and the touch screen (finger touch). However it does not respond to the Dell pen on the touch screen. mbst-grab-results.zip
  6. If the option "Manual scan performance impact>Manual scans take priority over other applications" is selected, the user might as well go have a cup of whatever when performing a Custom Scan. The system browsers and other tasks become very unresponsive. And this is with all protection modules turned off. Version 3.8.3 does not experience this nearly as significantly as version 4.0.1. Perhaps this can be toned down a bit in version 4 so that a user can experience high scanning speed and still use the system during the scan.
  7. Is it planned for MBAM 4 to automatically install/maintain/update the Malwarebytes Browser Extension for the various supported browsers (to include the new MS Edge currently in beta testing) ?
  8. Here are some more False Positives. The others that I posted on 23-Aug appear to be resolved. fp_tracker_2019-08-24_Forum_66657200-c633-11e9-9a53-305a3a05c7ae.zip
  9. I really, really like the new MB 4 interface. Takes a little click testing to find all the features; however, once a user becomes acclimated to the design concern, it is obviously a major enhancement over previous versions.
  10. More False Positives from a scheduled scan using MB 4.0.1 fp_tracker_2019-08-23_Forum_54000b24-c56c-11e9-ad0e-305a3a05c7ae.zip
  11. This tool needs updated to incorporate Malwarebytes 4.0. I did a repair on 4.0 using the current tool version and it indicated that it replaced 4.0 with the current 3.8.3. However, MB 4.0 beta was not replaced. mbst-grab-results.zip
  12. Attached is a False Positive report from the first scan of MB 4.0 Beta. fp_tracker_2019-08-23_Forum_77b2b672-c565-11e9-bdaf-305a3a05c7ae.zip fp_tracker_2019-08-23_Forum_9d89ee7c-c567-11e9-bbff-305a3a05c7ae.zip
  13. Site hxxps://med iaarea.net/en/MediaInfo is now blocked. False Positive ?
  14. As of today, https;//www.macecraft.com is being blocked. Unless something has changed to the bad, this is a FP.
  • Create New...

Important Information

This site uses cookies - We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.